Re: Valid HTML

To: <www-lib@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Valid HTML
From: Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 1996 09:47:19 -0400
From www-lib-request@www10.w3.org Sun Sep 22 09: 52:30 1996
Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19960922134719.00d47044@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
X-List-URL: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Archives/Public/www-lib/
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32)
X-Sender: papresco@csclub.uwaterloo.ca

At 11:00 PM 9/21/96 -0700, Don Park wrote:
>Daniel,
>
>I agree that we should all encourage use of valid HTML.  However,
>developers of HTML consuming application and tools, whether they work for
>Microsoft or a hole-in-the-wall, do not have the luxury to spit back bad
>HTML pages.  Only the developers of HTML producing applications and tools
>have the ability to improve the situation.

HTML consumers do have the option of _flagging_ incorrect HTML. If
validation were easier and more ubiquitous, it would be done more often.

 Paul Prescod

Prev: w3c-libwww-4.1b5 BUG and suggestions
Next: Re:
Index: Message index of www-lib@w3.org mailing list
Thread: Thread index of www-lib@w3.org mailing list