- From: Arthur Smith <apsmith@aps.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 11:35:49 -0400
- To: bancroft@america.net
- CC: www-lib@w3.org, Tanmay Patwardhan <tpthesis@hotmail.com>, Paul Dlug <paul@ridge.aps.org>
Vic Bancroft wrote:
> Ouch, that should teach me to read through a patch before sending.
> The deletions from lines 89,116 actually answer the prior question.
> This just makes the initialization conditional.
>
> more,
> l8r,
> v
>
Right - I was about to respond to your previous email and then saw your
second :-)
It would be nice to make all the other initializations conditional for
consistency, but there didn't seem to be an easy way to check for
previous initialization of the other lists, with the existing methods.
On test suites - we tried out "Check" (a unit test framework for C) but
the sorts of things we were re-factoring it wasn't very helpful with
(database and other remote queries). Might be good here though.
Arthur
Received on Monday, 1 August 2005 15:33:31 UTC