- From: Howard Cole <howard.cole@selestial.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:00:50 +0000
- To: www-lib@w3.org
Not speaking authoratively, I think this is badly formed HTML; all '<' and '>' tags should be represented as "<" and ">" respectively. Howard Cole www.selestial.com Shashank Kavishwar wrote: > Well, the ‘<’ character can appear in HTML in no reference to a tag. > For e.g. I recently saw a signature as: > ><')))>< > >Name > >Title > >Company > >Direct Line > >Mobile > >e-mail: > >web site > > > > Shouldn’t the ‘<’ character, if its not an HTML tag be kept as it is > while parsing? Basically, I think the presence of a ‘<’ character in > the HTML which is not part of a tag, should not break the parse > function to skip the rest of the HTML after the ‘<’ character. > > The Perl HTML::Parser has the capability to do this, and will parse > the HTML correctly. > > > _FrontBridge introduces Message Archive and Secure Email. Get leading > Enterprise Message Security services from FrontBridge._ > www.frontbridge.com <http://www.frontbridge.com>
Received on Friday, 11 March 2005 14:05:43 UTC