- From: Manuele Kirsch Pinheiro <Manuele.Kirsch_Pinheiro@inrialpes.fr>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:37:56 +0100
- To: www-lib@w3.org
Hi everybody, I known, I risk to create a big discussion, but... ;) I would like to known everybody's opinion about a small detail about "Expect : 100-continue". Is this header mandatory when we are sending any kind of message body? It's claire for me that, when we are using POST and PUT methods, this header is very useful. But, and the rest? For example, the new methods proposed by WebDAV? I didn't use it in my webdav module. In fact, I used the message body suggestion from Josh Watt, Xinju Wang and Steinar Bang discussion (by the way, Thank you all! :)). But, in a off-line discussion, somebody ask me about that.. I search in HTTP/1.1 specification (RFC2616) and in WebDAV (RFC2518), and I found anything that indicates that "Expect: 100-continue" header is mandatory when sending a body. Even more, RFC2518 don't do any mention to it.. So, I think that is not mandatory, but just a question of "common sense". A client developper may decide when it is necessary and when it is useful and when it must be used.. What you (everybody) think about it? Should we use always "Expect: 100-continue" header when sending any body, even small xml bodies? Best Regards! Manuele
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 13:33:34 UTC