RE: SSL related question...

Hi Kinuko Yasuda,

Thank you. I successfully installed libwww 5.3.1. 
In order to pass the "make", the following changes had to be made, after I
installed OpenSSL 0.9.6:
 mv /usr/local/include/ssl/openssl/rand.h /usr/local/include/ssl
 cp /usr/local/include/ssl/openssl/ssl.h /usr/local/include/ssl
It seems libwww 5.3.1 doesn't know OpenSSL 0.9.6 put all of .h
under /usr/local/include/ssl/openssl.

Cecilia
-----Original Message-----
From:  [mailto:kinuko@tom.sfc.keio.ac.jp]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 9:04 AM
To: Guo, Xuan C (Cecilia), NNAD; www-lib@w3.org
Subject: RE: SSL related question... 



In message RE: SSL related question... 
      Kinuko Yasuda <kinuko@tom.sfc.keio.ac.jp> wrote:

>  > By the way, I installed OpenSSL before libwww-5.3.1 on the same
machine.
>  > Could you tell me where I should use --with-ssl=[PATH]? 
> 
> You should specify where you installed OpenSSL :-)
> If you installed it just by typing "make install", 
> try "--with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl" or "--with-ssl=/usr/local/openssl".

I checked the configure script again...

Sorry, please ignore the above message.
It seems that you cannot specify the exact PATH by --with-ssl option.
Just "--with-ssl" or "--with-ssl=yes" will be OK.

Thanks,
--
Kinuko YASUDA <kinuko@tom.sfc.keio.ac.jp>
Keio University SFC, JAPAN.

Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2000 02:52:23 UTC