- From: Christopher Keller <christopher.keller@epropose.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 13:20:04 -0700
- To: www-lib@w3.org
- Message-ID: <390DE6F4.CA71A3E1@epropose.com>
Yeah, that's pretty much what I figured. Putting in "-Wl, -Bstatic" and just having "-static" seem to imply the same thing (at least with gcc). I tested both just in case. I'm getting the same error though, so they have to be indentical. I'm including a copy of the link error I'm getting just in case it rings any bells with anyone. As far as the install for libwww went, I just followed the unix directions for generating a configure file, then ran "make; make install". It compiled and installed without any errors, and dynamic linking seems to work as expected. I've been long away from the C world (having been in the realms of Perl and Java for the past few years), so it's entirely possible I'm doing something stupid. In case it matters, I'm on a Inetl/Linux box running Red Hat 6.2. I'm using a fairly new version of libwww (downloaded it late last week). Thanks for any help anyone has. I'd building a tool for stress testing web servers/servlet engines and would like to be able to distribute a binary without having to install any libraries. % gcc -o static_chunk chunk.o -Wl,-Bstatic `libwww-config --libs` /usr/local/lib/libwwwapp.a(HTInit.o): In function `HTConverterInit': /home/ckeller/software/libwww/Library/src/HTInit.c:84: undefined reference to `HTXML_new' /home/ckeller/software/libwww/Library/src/HTInit.c:85: undefined reference to `HTXML_new' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status -- Christopher Keller Senior Software Engineer ePropose, Inc -- San Francisco, CA
Received on Monday, 1 May 2000 16:20:02 UTC