- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 16:05:11 -0500
- To: Mikhail Grouchinski <mgrouch@usa.net>, www-lib@w3.org
At 15:45 1/28/99 EST, Mikhail Grouchinski wrote: >Why not to move the call of after filters before calling destructor of >Net object. Otherwise statistics collected by HTNet object >will be not available within request After filter. >The functions HTRequest_bytesRead HTRequest_bytesWritten will >always return -1; Yes, I was looking at this the other day and found the following problem: remove_net() really does two things - it unregisters the Net object, checks to see if new requests are to be started and then deletes the object. I think we would want the first two things to happen before we call the after filters and only the deletion of the Net object to happen afterwards. That is, remove_net should be split into two. Do you agree? Henrik -- Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, World Wide Web Consortium http://www.w3.org/People/Frystyk
Received on Thursday, 28 January 1999 16:05:26 UTC