- From: olga <olga@goliath.eai.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:47:50 -0600 (CST)
- To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
- Cc: www-lib@w3.org, olga@goliath.eai.com
I do not have negatives any more. 1) I do HTNet_deleteAfter(HTCacheFilter) in init finction Then for request: HTRequest_addRqHd(request, HT_C_IMS); In thit case file is loaded and 200 is returned event though I know that file is not changed on server. There is If-modified-since header in request. 2) If I do not do HTNet_deleteAfter(HTCacheFilter) in init function (so HTCacheFilter is present) and for request add HTRequest_addRqHd(request, HT_C_IMS). In second case I have 304 return but also a core dump. So neither way works correctly. Olga. On 26-Jan-99 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > At 13:24 1/26/99 -0600, olga wrote: >>So, you are saying that times are ok? >>(though you said it is correct for ET but I am in CT zone). Why it is loading >>in presence of If-modified-since header then? > > I understood you said: > >>So if no HTCacheFilter but HT_C_IMS - no 304, >>If HTCacheFilter (and HT_C_IMS added) - 304 and coredump. > > and that > > a) the first problem was caused by a negative LM in local time (doesn't > matter if ET or CT - it's still west of GMT). > > b) the second problem was caused by lack of initializing the filter which > handles the 304 case. The reason why you get a 304 is probably that it uses > the etag from the server and not the lm date. > > Did I miss something? > > Henrik > -- > Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, > World Wide Web Consortium > http://www.w3.org/People/Frystyk ---------------------------------- E-Mail: olga <olga@eai.com> Date: 26-Jan-99 Time: 13:33:49 This message was sent by XFMail ----------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 26 January 1999 14:44:04 UTC