- From: <janderson@mail-2.wtic.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 11:13:46 -0800 (PST)
- To: "Neil L. Griffin" <ngriffin@tritonsvc.com>
- cc: "'www-lib@w3.org'" <www-lib@w3.org>, Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@w3.org>
well.. my proprietary language (AWTO) uses LibWWW.. its commercial.. and yeah.. its a long-term implementation.. because LibWWW is reletively stable and has an abundance of features. The only other similar code that I have used is my own.. and well.. if I ever finish something that compares to LibWWW then I will use it commercially but its LibWWW all the way, for the time being.. On Wed, 11 Mar 1998, Neil L. Griffin wrote: > Greetings, > > At the suggestion of Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, I'm sending this e-mail in an > attempt to determine how many people/products are using libwww. > > If you would take a moment to respond to the following survey, I will summarize > the results and send them in another e-mail to the <www-lib@w3.org> mailing > list. > > Thank you for your time. > > Regards, > > Neil Griffin > > > > Questions: > > 1. Is your organization currently using libwww? If yes, then what version? If > no, then why not? > > 2. How many products does your organization have that use libwww? > > 3. Are these product(s) commercial / educational / government / scientific ? A > brief description would be helpful. > > 4. Is libwww part of your organization's short-term web plans? Why or why not? > > 5. Is libwww part of your organization's long-term web plans? Why or why not? > > 6. Have you ever fixed a bug or improved the functionality of libwww? If yes, > then have you ever submitted your fix so that it would become a permanent part > of libwww? > > 7. Have you tried similar software such as GNU's WGET or some other library? In > your opinion, how does it compare to libwww? >
Received on Thursday, 12 March 1998 14:25:14 UTC