- From: Rainer Klute <klute@nads.de>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 17:52:31 +0100
- To: Laurent Vinesse <lvinesse@jouve.fr>
- Cc: www-lib@w3.org, "Rainer Klute" <klute@nads.de>, "Jan Wedekind" <wedekind@nads.de>
>Which just canonizes the SGML stream on output, then we have our own
>processing of Data. e.g this canonizer would add the omitted tags.
>I do not agree that
> <ul>
> <li><p>foo
> <li><p>bar
> </ul>
>and
> <ul>
> <li><p>foo</p></li>
> <li><p>bar</p></li>
> </ul>
>should be rendered differently, because the content is exactly the same,...
Indeed! But some browsers just do it. :-(
>but
>in fact the parsing or canonizing process should be tolerant enough to let
>faulty stream pass in some situations. Warnings should be generated to allow
>browser to take decision.
Exactly.
>We are also considering using SGMLS, NSGMLS, SP (...) to canonize on-the-fly.
Do you have some experience or are you still just considering?
Best regards
Rainer Klute
Dipl.-Inform. Rainer Klute NADS - Advertising on nets
NADS GmbH
Emil-Figge-Str. 80 Tel.: +49 231 9742570
D-44227 Dortmund Fax: +49 231 9742573
<http://www.nads.de/~klute/>
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 1996 11:54:05 UTC