- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 14:51:11 -0400 (EDT)
- To: LSH <lsh@lubrizol.com>
- Cc: www-lib@w3.org
> The things that baffled me the most was that the library was written > is pseudo-C++. The docs spoke of methods and objects when in all actuality > there were none! I really wished that the library WAS written in C++. Due to popular demand (read outcry), I wrote a description of the C++ in C encapsulation scheme used in the library. Please see http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Library/User/Platform/Style.html > Why in the age of Object-Oriented revolution, when most of algorithms > and design methods are developped using some kind of OO methods, would > you choose a non-OO language and try your darnest to make it look like > an OO one? And for my 2 cents: Object-Oriented is an approach, not a language. :) -eric
Received on Thursday, 23 May 1996 14:51:16 UTC