- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1995 17:25:27 -0400
- To: mitch@tam.net (Mitch DeShields)
- Cc: www-lib@w3.org
> Yep, this seems to be mostly working. My message handler gets called with > FD_CONNECT, then one or more FD_READ notifications. In each case, I call > HTTPLoad(). This part is working, I can see the received bytes in the read > buffer. > > However, I never get an FD_CLOSE notification. I would think that (on a > GET) the HTTP server would close the socket after sending the information to > the client. The FD_CLOSE flag is included in the lEvent in > WSAAsyncSelect(), and I do get other notifications. I have even tried to > close the socket (closesocket()) from a button press event. This is a unix simplification which you might consider a bug. The close notification is not sent because it is not registered using the HTEvent_register() function. In the current model you can only have one callback function pr. socket at a time which have to be the protocol load module (for example HTLoadHTTP()). There is no room for having a callback for FD_CLOSE, another for FD_READ etc. at the same time what is what you want. What I think that you can do is to register the callback function just before you close the socket. PS: In version 3.1 of the Library HTLoadHTTP() is not directly a callback function as it still uses some bits from the old event model. However, in the new version that I am giving out in an alpha version to W3C members in a couple of days, HTTLoadHTTP _is_ a callback function just like the others and the NT based event model provided by Charlie Brooks is fully integrated with the Library. This version does also have a net manager that controls the number of open sockets and enables persistent connections. -- Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, <frystyk@w3.org> World-Wide Web Consortium, MIT/LCS NE43-356 545 Technology Square, Cambridge MA 02139, USA
Received on Friday, 22 September 1995 17:30:21 UTC