- From: QingLong <qinglong@yggdrasil.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 19:40:43
- To: www-lib-bugs@w3.org
Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org> wrote: > > The problem was that the output buffer wasn't explicitly flushed which > caused the request newer to be written to the socket. In non-preemptive > mode, there is a timeout forcing a flush after 50 ms but that doesn't > happen when using blocking sockets. > > Also, you need to disable the persistent cache when using blocking sockets > - otherwise you run into trouble. > Is the blocking sockets technique conflict to the persisitent cache using fundamental (it would seem to be very strange to me), or is this conflict due to libwww-5.1a architecture? Thank you. -- QingLong Yggdrasil Computing, Incorporated +1 408 261-6630 "Free Software For The Rest of Us."
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 1997 14:28:49 UTC