Re: BUG: preemptive operation fails under libwww-5.1

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org> wrote:
>
> The problem was that the output buffer wasn't explicitly flushed which
> caused the request newer to be written to the socket. In non-preemptive
> mode, there is a timeout forcing a flush after 50 ms but that doesn't
> happen when using blocking sockets.
>
> Also, you need to disable the persistent cache when using blocking sockets
> - otherwise you run into trouble.
>
   Is the blocking sockets technique conflict to the persisitent cache using
 fundamental (it would seem to be very strange to me),
 or is this conflict due to libwww-5.1a architecture?

   Thank you.

--
      QingLong                  Yggdrasil Computing, Incorporated
   +1 408 261-6630             "Free Software For The Rest of Us."

Received on Wednesday, 2 April 1997 14:28:49 UTC