- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 11:22:14 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: Thomas Kriegelstein <tk4@irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de>
- cc: www-jigsaw@w3.org
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Thomas Kriegelstein wrote:
> So there is no easy way to extend one or more of these classes to do what i
> want. The easiest solution i came up with, would be to extend HttpBasicServer
> and HttpBasicConnection to suit my needs, but this is impossible without
> having my classes under org.w3c.www.protocol.http.
>
> So, i have questions, again ;)
> Will the visibility of the mentioned classes be changed in future
> releases, or do i have to implement all again? Besides, this would start
> with HttpServer and needs access to HttpServerState, which is as mentioned
> above only package-visible.
Yes, some classes have been too restricted, but it may be changed, and it
would be if it is useful, and in your case it seems to be useful :)
I will take a look at this soon, but you can start and tell me which
classes you want public.
Regards,
/\ - Yves Lafon - World Wide Web Consortium -
/\ / \ Architecture Domain - Jigsaw Activity Leader
/ \ \/\
/ \ / \ http://www.w3.org/People/Lafon - ylafon@w3.org
Received on Monday, 25 September 2000 05:22:19 UTC