- From: Ingmar Krusch <nacht@novedia.de>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 10:42:44 +0200
- To: "Jigsaw Mailingliste" <www-jigsaw@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 1999 04:43:34 UTC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hoi > > I'm currently examining the classes Logger and CommonLogger. The > > documentation says that: "The Logger class is the abstract class > > that loggers must implement". I'm wondering why Logger is an > > abstract class and not an Interface?! What's the actual benefit > > for the Jigsaw design? > > Usually, we are using interfaces for when it can be implemented in > many classes. A logger will always be a subclass of "Logger" hence > the abstract class. Yes, that's the technical reasoning. But is there any actual benefit? Does it actually make your life easier coding jigsaw if it IS-A Logger? See, I'm just curious. Ingmar -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.1 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBOBVbdLKzgXyc3RmAEQK3nwCg4dai1uXU5vX3nvRley/eieRj54gAoIvU LS3RcxJLTkW4goHn+3dSCY8t =YFTt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 1999 04:43:34 UTC