- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 11:02:18 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: Julianne Freire de Sousa Pepeu <jfsp@di.ufpe.br>
- cc: www-jigsaw@w3.org
On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Julianne Freire de Sousa Pepeu wrote: > Why two CacheFilter classes (w3c.jigsaw.filters.CacheFilter and > w3c.www.protocol.http.cache.CacheFilter)? Are both classes actually used? > In which circunstances each of them may be used? The first CacheFilter is a server-side filter which caches the replies generated by the server, if you have a Resource that generate a page very slowly, you can use this filter to cache it for some time. The second cache (w3c.www.protocol.http.cache.CacheFilter) is a client-side filter which caches the replies generated by the client, for example in the proxy. > Since w3c.www.protocol.http.cache.CacheFilter class doesn't seem to be > a filter, it cannot work coupled to a resource, does it? In this case, > why does this class have the ingoingFilter e outgoingFilter methods? It is a filter! But a client-side one, you may also notice an exception filter which is used in ProxyDispatcher, for example. (See the "Client Side Components" part of the documentation). > Is it possible to use the proxy coupled if the cache mecanism disabled? > How to disable it? By default, the proxy doesn't use the cache, to use the cache, or ICP, or ProxyDipatcher (or any hand-made client-side filter), you should add it from the Proxy property sheet, or set directly the w3c.www.protocol.http.filters property in the server props file (it is better to add the filters via the configuration interface). /\ E tae koe ki Aotearoa kaua e whawhai; e u koe ki uta, /\ / \ kei mahi ki tai ki Tu, puhia he angina; e mau ki tai / \ \/\ ki Noho, he huhu, he pepe, he hanehane. / \ / \ - Yves Lafon - W3C / INRIA - ylafon@w3.org -
Received on Monday, 30 June 1997 05:02:32 UTC