- From: Mark Friedman <mark@intraspect.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jul 1996 09:25:32 -0700
- To: nexus@adv.es
- CC: www-jigsaw@w3.org
I certainly wasn't bothered by the original message. I was just using it as a springboard for a different question that I had about what plans W3 had with Jigsaw vis-a-vis the SUN servlet API. -Mark Nexus wrote: > > Mark Friedman wrote: > > > > The flip side to the subject question is: What, if any, plans do the > > Jigsaw folks have to make Jigsaw conform to the impending Java Servlet > > API from Sun? > > > > -Mark > > Sorry Mark, maybe I wasn't clear in my previous message (sorry to bother you). > > There was no flip side about Sun's or <put name here> APIs or products. > If Jigsaw is the new w3c ref. server, I just wondered *who* if any, > > found this as *interesting* addition to any (new?) AVALILABLE server. > > I like to forget CGI heterogeneous scripting; and Jigsaw is more versatile > than CGIs (as everyone, even me, knows). Maybe we can spend our time > PROGRAMMING something *really* integrated in our server far away from > Form&db interfaces or WebChat. And, of course, Jigsaw can do that if there's > enough PEOPLE (not just money) interested in it. > > The WWW can be more useful for normal people doing normal things > than for other people looking for fast bucks (there are too much there). > With this architechture we can make USEFUL programs accessible through > the Web. That's what I really would like to be done, and I would like to see > in the future, so I need someone supporting that. > > I like feel my posting *really* bothered you (and maybe more people). > That was not the Subject. Sorry. > > -- > I~nigo Gonzalez Ponce nexus@adv.es ; nexus@freenet.hut.fi > Snail: Juan Diges Anton 27 6C 19003 Guadalajara (Spain) > Home : +34 49 224 656 (remenber GMT+01 ;-)
Received on Monday, 8 July 1996 12:23:34 UTC