- From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 01:47:04 +0100 (MET)
- To: mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch (Martin J. Duerst)
- Cc: kweide@tezcat.com, koen@win.tue.nl, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-international@w3.org, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Martin J. Duerst: [...] > This results from the fact that there is no >specification about relative priority of Accept headers, or >how to combine them. The HTTP/1.1 specification does not define `dimension X always takes priority over Y', but it *does* allow such priorities to be expressed if they exist for a user agent. Using quality factors, a user agent can express which consideration takes priority. For example, with Accept-Language: en;q=1.0, he;q=0.2 Accept-Charset: <latin-1>;q=0.9, <latin-5>;q=1.0 getting the english language would have priority over getting <latin-5>. Another user agent could give priority to getting <latin-5> by sending Accept-Language: en;q=1.0, he;q=0.9 Accept-Charset: <latin-1>;q=0.2, <latin-5>;q=1.0 . Note that, both historically and in the upcoming transparent content negotiation specification, quality factors are combined by multiplying them. [...] >This does not work with your example, but assume >you specify Polish and Czech and ISO-8859-2, and the server >has the document in Russian and Hungarian, you might get the >document in Hungarian (because it is ISO-8859-2) even if you >will understand more in Russian. Note that under transparent content negotiation, you will *never* get a Hungarian document if you specify Polish and Czech and ISO-8859-2. You will get a list of available documents instead. Under plain HTTP/1.x, you might indeed get the Hungarian version. >Regards, Martin. Koen.
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 1996 19:47:09 UTC