- From: Fuqiao Xue <xfq@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 08:58:55 +0800
- To: www-international@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/2025/05/29-i18n-minutes.html
text version:
– DRAFT –
Internationalization Working Group Teleconference
29 May 2025
[2]Agenda. [3]IRC log.
[2] https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/b7edae68-f52c-4aab-a1a6-3c37459e0786/20250529T150000/
[3] https://www.w3.org/2025/05/29-i18n-irc
Attendees
Present
addison, Fuqiao, JcK
Regrets
Atsushi, Bert
Chair
Addison Phillips
Scribe
xfq
Contents
1. [4]Agenda Review
2. [5]Action Items
3. [6]Info Share
4. [7]BCP 47 Extension T in the Choosing a Language Tag
article (Fuqiao)
5. [8]Sequences with variation selectors in string-search
(Fuqiao)
Meeting minutes
Agenda Review
Action Items
<addison> [9]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues
[9] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues
<addison> #170
<gb> [10]Action 170 reserve two days worth of meetings at tpac
(on aphillips) due 2025-05-22
[10] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/170
<addison> close #170
<gb> Closed [11]issue #170
[11] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/170
<addison> #168
<gb> [12]Action 168 add instructions on dark mode to
i18n-editors (on xfq) due 2025-05-01
[12] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/168
<addison> close #168
<gb> Closed [13]issue #168
[13] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/168
xfq: did #168
Info Share
addison: I attended the ARIA planning call
… to talk about their aria key shortcut
… which was an open issue that we had
… after reviewing with them I agree that their text was
probably fine
… they don't need to do anything about the issue
WebNN to Completed
BCP 47 Extension T in the Choosing a Language Tag article (Fuqiao)
<addison> fuqiao: richard gave me some suggestion
<addison> ... any suggestions?
addison: I had some different ideas to suggest
<addison> [14]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-drafts/pull/658/files
[14] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-drafts/pull/658/files
<gb> [15]Pull Request 658 Mention BCP 47 Extension T (by xfq)
[15] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-drafts/pull/658
addison: you're trying to mention mention the thing and give an
example but you're not trying to write an exhaustive treaties
on the thing
addison: at least give a tag that one would actually use
r12a: ja-t-it is a very rarely used thing
… and it's very vague as to what it means
… so I suggested that xfq uses a transcription
… like uk-Latn-t-uk-cyrl
… and there's the m0 stuff
… which could be used if you want to specify which
transcription
<addison> [16]https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/dev/
tr35.html#unicode-bcp-47-t-extension
[16] https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/dev/tr35.html#unicode-bcp-47-t-extension
addison: I'd almost point at the section in TR35, but that's
not super clear either
xfq: TR35 is not easy to understand
<addison> [17]https://
deploy-preview-80--i18n-glossary.netlify.app/#g
[17] https://deploy-preview-80--i18n-glossary.netlify.app/#g
addison: 'glyph' definition
… I intend to use the same definition in specdev
xfq: "You can think of a font as a collection of glyphs." is
not accurate
… also includes encoding information, hinting instructions,
etc.
… and metrics (kerning, ascenders/descenders, etc.)
[Discuss the Unicode code point styling]
addison: base.css has Unicode code point styling, and this file
has it too
… I'll find and eradicate that
Sequences with variation selectors in string-search (Fuqiao)
[18]w3c/string-search#24
[18] https://github.com/w3c/string-search/pull/24
<gb> [19]Pull Request 24 Sequences with variation selectors (by
xfq)
[19] https://github.com/w3c/string-search/pull/24
[20]https://
deploy-preview-24--w3c-string-search.netlify.app/#variation-sel
ectors
[20] https://deploy-preview-24--w3c-string-search.netlify.app/#variation-selectors
<r12a> [21]https://
deploy-preview-24--w3c-string-search.netlify.app/#variation-sel
ectors
[21] https://deploy-preview-24--w3c-string-search.netlify.app/#variation-selectors
r12a: you're using graphics for the character code names, you
should use the large size rather than the small size for VS17
and VS 18
xfq: do you have a link to the large size images?
Variation Selectors Supplement block
<r12a> [22]https://r12a.github.io/c/
Variation_Selectors_Supplement/large/E0100.png
[22] https://r12a.github.io/c/Variation_Selectors_Supplement/large/E0100.png
<addison> [23]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-drafts/blob/gh-pages/
articles/language-negotiation/language-negotiation.md
[23] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-drafts/blob/gh-pages/articles/language-negotiation/language-negotiation.md
addison: one more piece of homework
… I'd like to finish off the language negotiation thing
addison: I'm a member of Unicode's Technical Coordinating Group
… the TCG is considering how to reorganize the specs that
Unicode produces
… historically they've been technical reports stored on
/reports on the Unicode website
… what would make sense from our perspective wrt referring to
Unicode standards if there were more than just the character
encoding related ones in the report space
… you can think of this like IETF I-Ds and RFCs and BCP and STD
etc.
r12a: are these the UAX documents?
addison: UAXs, UTSs, and others
… should they all be UTSs? should they continue to be numbered
sequentially?
… MessageFormat looks nice in Markdown and HTML, but it looks
clunky when it gets merged into CLDR
r12a: I don't imagine that they would change the URLs for any
of these
… but they might change the Unicode 17 content to include the
UAXs
Received on Friday, 30 May 2025 00:59:11 UTC