[minutes] Internationalization telecon 2024-12-05

https://www.w3.org/2024/12/05-i18n-minutes.html





text version:

                              – DRAFT –
            Internationalization Working Group Teleconference

05 December 2024

    [2]Agenda. [3]IRC log.

       [2] 
https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/b7edae68-f52c-4aab-a1a6-3c37459e0786/20241205T150000/
       [3] https://www.w3.org/2024/12/05-i18n-irc

Attendees

    Present
           addison, atsushi, Bert, JcK, r12a, xfq

    Regrets
           -

    Chair
           Addison Phillips

    Scribe
           atsushi

Contents

     1. [4]Agenda Review
     2. [5]Action Items
     3. [6]Info Share
     4. [7]RADAR Review
     5. [8]Pending Issue Review
     6. [9]String-Search PR
     7. [10]Language/Locale Negotiation Article
     8. [11]TAG/I18N string recommendations
     9. [12]close some WAI ACT review issues
    10. [13]Summary of action items

Meeting minutes

   Agenda Review

    bert: one agenda+

    addison: also added

    bert: MathML core, close waiting resolution

   Action Items

    <addison> [14]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues

      [14] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues

    <addison> #147

    <gb> [15]Action 147 Follow up on normativity warnings about
    glossary (on aphillips)

      [15] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/147

    <addison> #146

    addison: need to go back conversation, and see what will
    happen, pending

    <gb> [16]Action 146 create new calendar entry for I18N+CSS (on
    aphillips) due 2024-11-28

      [16] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/146

    addison: new calendar invite sent

    <addison> close #146

    <gb> Closed [17]issue #146

      [17] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/146

    <addison> #145

    <gb> [18]Action 145 publish timezone for wide review (on
    aphillips) due 2024-11-28

      [18] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/145

    addison: done previously

    xfq: addison to send email about this

    <addison> #144

    <gb> [19]Action 144 remind everyone to read the language
    negotiation article (on aphillips) due 2024-11-28

      [19] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/144

    <addison> close #144

    <gb> Closed [20]issue #144

      [20] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/144

    <addison> #143

    <gb> [21]Action 143 make comments on the encoding issue
    attached to i18n-activity#1940 (on aphillips) due 2024-11-28

      [21] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/143

    <addison> #142

    <gb> [22]Action 142 check if we can publish the new version of
    jlreq (on himorin) due 2024-11-21

      [22] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/142

    <addison> #141

    <gb> [23]Action 141 set up IETF reviews requested by mnot@ et
    al (on xfq) due 2024-11-14

      [23] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/141

    xfq: sent pending requests and added labels to track comments

    <addison> close #141

    <gb> Closed [24]issue #141

      [24] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/141

    <addison> #135

    <gb> [25]Action 135 follow up on XR issue 1393 about locale in
    session (on aphillips) due 2024-10-17

      [25] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/135

    <addison> #134

    addison: will work on #135

    <gb> [26]Action 134 file an issue about making input respect
    locale (on aphillips) due 2024-10-05

      [26] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/134

    <gb> [27]CLOSED Action 13 Make sure generics are comfortable to
    read in the content language (on frivoal) due 18 Jul 2023

      [27] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/13

    <addison> close #134

    <gb> Closed [28]issue #134

      [28] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/134

    addison: added needs-resolution, and wait for response

    <addison> #127

    <gb> [29]Action 127 make a list of shared topics of interest
    between TG2 and W3C-I18N (on aphillips) due 2024-09-30

      [29] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/127

    <addison> #125

    <gb> [30]Action 125 propose creating a UTR for text-emphasis
    skip if we can get help with maintain (on aphillips) due
    2024-09-30

      [30] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/125

    <addison> #114

    <gb> [31]Action 114 read through i18n-activity#1659 and report
    on whether we're satisfied (on r12a) due 2024-08-22

      [31] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/114

    r12a: connected to wider stuff, suggest to close

    <addison> [32]i18n-activity#1659

      [32] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/1659

    <gb> [33]Issue 1659 [css-text-4] Add 'text-spacing: trim-all'?
    (by w3cbot) [close?] [tracker] [s:css-text] [i:spacing]
    [spec-type-issue] [jlreq] [clreq] [advice-requested]
    [t:typ_misc] [wg:css] [script-jpan]

      [33] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/1659

    <addison> close #114

    <gb> Closed [34]issue #114

      [34] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/114

    <addison> #90

    <gb> [35]Action 90 steal some of henri's text from
    scroll-to-text-fragment for string-search (on aphillips) due
    2024-04-18

      [35] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/90

    <addison> #89

    <gb> [36]Action 89 update i18n specs to support dark mode (on
    xfq) due 2024-04-18

      [36] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/89

    <addison> #33

    <gb> [37]Action 33 Close issues marked `close?` or bring to WG
    for further review (on aphillips)

      [37] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/33

    <addison> #7

    <gb> [38]Action 7 Remind shepherds to tend to their awaiting
    comment resolutions (Evergreen) (on aphillips, xfq, himorin,
    r12a, bert-github) due 18 Jul 2023

      [38] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/7

    <addison> #4

    <gb> [39]Action 4 Work with respec and bikeshed to provide the
    character markup template as easy-to-use markup (on aphillips)
    due 27 Jul 2023

      [39] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/4

   Info Share

    addison: cldr to approve message format, and issue new version
    of cldr by end of year

    <r12a> [40]https://r12a.github.io/scripts/script-features/

      [40] https://r12a.github.io/scripts/script-features/

    r12a: new script table above
    … 79 scripts supported

    [chat around rtl]

    JcK: message format, two IETF WG is working on similar point

   RADAR Review

    <addison> [41]https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/91/views/1

      [41] https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/91/views/1

    addison: three new one

    xfq: can ask about real deadline

    addison: have we established protocol?
    … usually, sending issue via email to them

    addison: will them make similar request in future?

    xfq: currently they haven't had any similar formal review
    items, they mentioned this via IETF meeting, Mark sent email to
    PLH but no reply

    addison: someone need to be assigned to these IETF-W3C
    communication

    JcK: IETF-ICANN-WHATWG loop for IDNA, and pushing to new
    version of IDNA

    xfq: will take IDNA

    addison: take Modern Network Unicode, some comments, but not
    wrote down
    … can take Unicode character repertoire subsets

    xfq: found no issue for DAPT

   Pending Issue Review

    <addison> [42]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/
    issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Apending

      [42] 
https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:pending

   String-Search PR

    addison: any comment before merging?

   Language/Locale Negotiation Article

    [no objection to merge]

    <addison> [43]w3c/i18n-drafts#581

      [43] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-drafts/pull/581

    <gb> [44]Pull Request 581 Initial work on language-negotiation
    materials (by aphillips)

      [44] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-drafts/pull/581

    <addison> [45]https://github.com/aphillips/i18n-drafts/blob/
    gh-pages/articles/language-negotiation/language-negotiation.md

      [45] 
https://github.com/aphillips/i18n-drafts/blob/gh-pages/articles/language-negotiation/language-negotiation.md

    addison: one point to welcome update is on table, anyone need
    more time to check?

    bert: looks fine

    <xfq> +1 to merge

    addison: will bring to wide review, after merging

   TAG/I18N string recommendations

    <addison> [46]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/
    public-i18n-core/2024OctDec/0074.html

      [46] 
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2024OctDec/0074.html

    addison: email thread above

    <addison> [47]w3ctag/design-principles#454

      [47] https://github.com/w3ctag/design-principles/issues/454

    <gb> [48]Issue 454 I18N string best practices vs.
    design-principles (by aphillips) [Status: In Progress] [Status:
    Consensus to write] [Agenda+] [i18n-needs-resolution]

      [48] https://github.com/w3ctag/design-principles/issues/454

    addison: filed one issue to TAG for design document
    … on DOM string

    <addison> [49]https://w3c.github.io/
    bp-i18n-specdev/#char_string

      [49] https://w3c.github.io/bp-i18n-specdev/#char_string

    xfq: DOMString is recommended over USVString

    addison: as INFRA does

    xfq: second paragraph is on handling, didn't seems clear

    r12a: DOMString is default?
    … danger is to list USVString

    xfq: specify algorithm or process seems too general, than first
    paragraph on porotcol

    xfq: give some example to our documents?

    addison: seeking how to tell people what I mean..
    … simple matching could also work by byte string

    [comparison around and discussion]

    addison: will seek around and try to say something

    ACTION: addison: propose specdev text related to
    [50]design-principles#464 discussion

      [50] https://github.com/w3c/design-principles/issues/464

    <gb> Created [51]action #148

      [51] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/148

   close some WAI ACT review issues

    <Bert> [52]w3c/i18n-activity#1909

      [52] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/1909

    <gb> [53]Issue 1909 Should ACT require the formats for rules to
    be localizable? (by bert-github) [needs-resolution] [wg:ag]
    [s:act-rules-format]

      [53] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/1909

    bert: WG proposed to turn localizable, and change acceptable.
    propose to close
    … answer in issue, possibly updated

    r12a: they say i18n easier, but not l10n

    <addison> > In addition to supporting people with disabilities,
    using an accessible format also makes internationalization of
    ACT Rules easier.

    <Bert> [54]w3c/i18n-activity#1912

      [54] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/1912

    <gb> [55]Issue 1912 Is the ‘descriptive title’ used for
    matching? (by bert-github) [needs-resolution] [wg:ag]
    [s:act-rules-format]

      [55] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/1912

    addison: our guidance is to have direction and language

    <Bert> [56]w3c/i18n-activity#1911

      [56] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/1911

    <gb> [57]Issue 1911 ACT does not require that the language of
    text is indicated (by bert-github) [needs-resolution] [wg:ag]
    [s:act-rules-format]

      [57] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/1911

Summary of action items

     1. [58]addison: propose specdev text related to
        design-principles#464 discussion

Received on Friday, 6 December 2024 02:02:17 UTC