[minutes] Internationalization telecon 2024-11-21

https://www.w3.org/2024/11/21-i18n-minutes.html





text version:


                              – DRAFT –
            Internationalization Working Group Teleconference

21 November 2024

    [2]Agenda. [3]IRC log.

       [2] 
https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/b7edae68-f52c-4aab-a1a6-3c37459e0786/20241121T150000/
       [3] https://www.w3.org/2024/11/21-i18n-irc

Attendees

    Present
           Addison, Atsushi, Bert, r12a, xfq

    Regrets
           JcK

    Chair
           Addison Phillips

    Scribe
           xfq, addison

Contents

     1. [4]Agenda Review
     2. [5]Action Items
     3. [6]Info Share
     4. [7]RADAR Review
     5. [8]Pending Issue Review
     6. [9]Proposed New Article: How to make list markers stand
        upright in vertical text
     7. [10]Merge: Language negotiation
     8. [11]Publish DNOTE: Working with Time and Timezones
     9. [12]AOB?
    10. [13]Summary of action items

Meeting minutes

   Agenda Review

   Action Items

    addison: anybody got something that they don't see in the
    agenda?

    <addison> [14]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues

      [14] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues

    <addison> #142

    <gb> [15]Action 142 check if we can publish the new version of
    jlreq (on himorin) due 2024-11-21

      [15] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/142

    atsushi: #142, trying to work on it, still pending

    atsushi: there's a long standing PR
    … I need to check

    <addison> #141

    <gb> [16]Action 141 set up IETF reviews requested by mnot@ et
    al (on xfq) due 2024-11-14

      [16] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/141

    <addison> #139

    <gb> [17]Action 139 review old timezone note to ensure all
    content is present and accounted for (on aphillips) due
    2024-11-07

      [17] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/139

    <addison> xfq: did contact mnot about where to put comments

    <addison> ... send comments to authors and art area mailing
    list and iesg

    addison: traditionally, the IETF does everything on mailing
    lists
    … what that probably means is that we should collect everything
    and write one email to the IESG list

    <addison> close #139

    <gb> Closed [18]issue #139

      [18] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/139

    <addison> #135

    <gb> [19]Action 135 follow up on XR issue 1393 about locale in
    session (on aphillips) due 2024-10-17

      [19] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/135

    addison: let's actually see the reviews and then decide what,
    if anything, we want to do

    <addison> #134

    <gb> [20]Action 134 file an issue about making input respect
    locale (on aphillips) due 2024-10-05

      [20] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/134

    <addison> #127

    <gb> [21]Action 127 make a list of shared topics of interest
    between TG2 and W3C-I18N (on aphillips) due 2024-09-30

      [21] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/127

    <addison> #125

    <gb> [22]Action 125 propose creating a UTR for text-emphasis
    skip if we can get help with maintain (on aphillips) due
    2024-09-30

      [22] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/125

    <addison> #114

    <gb> [23]Action 114 read through i18n-activity#1659 and report
    on whether we're satisfied (on r12a) due 2024-08-22

      [23] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/114

    <addison> #90

    <gb> [24]Action 90 steal some of henri's text from
    scroll-to-text-fragment for string-search (on aphillips) due
    2024-04-18

      [24] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/90

    <addison> #89

    <gb> [25]Action 89 update i18n specs to support dark mode (on
    xfq) due 2024-04-18

      [25] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/89

    <addison> #33

    <gb> [26]Action 33 Close issues marked `close?` or bring to WG
    for further review (on aphillips)

      [26] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/33

    <addison> #8

    xfq: dark mode, no progress

    <gb> [27]Action 8 Follow up on the status of Canvas and
    formatted text (on aphillips) due 18 Jul 2023

      [27] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/8

    <addison> #7

    <gb> [28]Action 7 Remind shepherds to tend to their awaiting
    comment resolutions (Evergreen) (on aphillips, xfq, himorin,
    r12a, bert-github) due 18 Jul 2023

      [28] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/7

    <addison> #4

    <gb> [29]Action 4 Work with respec and bikeshed to provide the
    character markup template as easy-to-use markup (on aphillips)
    due 27 Jul 2023

      [29] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/4

   Info Share

    addison: you may have all seen my email about the string-meta
    presentation

    r12a: I was talking with xfq earlier today and we were both
    thinking just recently that we've been thinking of starting a
    new account on Bluesky
    … now you have to have a Twitter account to be able to see
    stuff

    addison: since it's work to put stuff out there, we should
    minimize the work

    r12a: we've been doing it
    … what we do is we post the info on Mastodon and then we take
    that over and copy it basically, maybe resize it a little to X
    … it's not a major hassle

    <Bert> Don't know much about Bluesky, so no objection there.
    Leaving X seems good.

    addison: any objection?

   RADAR Review

    <addison> [30]https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/91/views/1

      [30] https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/91/views/1

    addison: Input Events

    <addison> [31]w3c/input-events#166

      [31] https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/166

    <gb> [32]Issue 166 Horizontal Review of Input events (by
    siusin)

      [32] https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/166

    <Bert> Media Capabilities not done yet

    xfq: EPUB 3.3, still pending
    … also for DAPT

   Pending Issue Review

    addison: I observed xfq have three to do by a month from now

    <addison> [33]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/
    issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Apending

      [33] 
https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:pending

    addison: do you want me to take Input Events?

    <addison> #1860

    <gb> Issue 1860 not found

    xfq: that's very helpful

    <addison> [34]i18n-activity#1860

      [34] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/1860

    <gb> [35]Issue 1860 type should be defined as identical to but
    not contain (by himorin) [pending] [non-I18N] [wg:vc]
    [s:controller-document]

      [35] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/1860

    addison: I'll take that one then

    addison: did you ever file that issue?

    atsushi: sorry, I think I totally forgot about this
    … it seems the document has been updated

    <addison> [36]i18n-activity#1940

      [36] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/1940

    <gb> [37]Issue 1940 0xA3 0xA0 in GB 18030 (by w3cbot) [pending]
    [tracker] [spec-type-issue] [clreq] [s:encoding] [whatwg]

      [37] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/1940

    addison: I saw some traffic on #1940

    <gb> Issue 1940 not found

    <addison> xfq: basically, the encoding spec, they changed the
    mapping of 0xA3 0xA0

    <addison> ... in gb18030 to U+3000 in Unicode

    <addison> ... it should map to E5E5, which is a PUA code point
    per GB

    <addison> ... but they don't map it according to GB because a
    bug filed in 2002

    <addison> ... people were using as a space characters and 3000
    is ideographic space

    <addison> ... it doesn't conform to GB standard

    <addison> ... file to see: do we need to keep this?

    <addison> xfq: since webpages using GB18030 are really few

    <addison> ... if they changed the mapping to conform, it would
    affect many pages

    <addison> ... their counter argument is that, then, yeah, we
    don't need to update this

    <addison> ... because it won't improve anything

    <addison> ... haven't analyzed if code points are really used
    to indicate space or not

    <addison> addison: what is the character 18030 thinks its
    encoding?

    <addison> xfq: it's a private use code point

    [38]https://pica.zhimg.com/80/
    v2-0ddb4db958237498fb3e34a36c3625c9_1440w.webp?source=1def8aca

      [38] 
https://pica.zhimg.com/80/v2-0ddb4db958237498fb3e34a36c3625c9_1440w.webp?source=1def8aca

    ACTION: addison: make comments on the encoding issue attached
    to [39]i18n-activity#1940

      [39] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/1940

    <gb> Created [40]action #143

      [40] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/143

    addison: because it's a non-character code point, I would
    almost rather see it go to FFFD
    … if GB 18030 hasn't assigned it

   Proposed New Article: How to make list markers stand upright in
   vertical text

    addison: that's something to look up

    <r12a> [41]https://w3c.github.io/i18n-drafts/questions/
    qa-upright-counters-in-vertical.html

      [41] 
https://w3c.github.io/i18n-drafts/questions/qa-upright-counters-in-vertical.html

    r12a: I'd like to send this out for a wide review
    … got one comment already from Murata-san
    … but it was a bit vague
    … he didn't tell me what browser he was using or which example
    exactly he was talking about
    … we talked about this on Tuesday with fantasai and florian
    … Murata-san's issue was that the digits above the vertical
    lines didn't look completely centered
    … it seems I need to raise an issue against the browsers
    … that says you should align these combined upright
    … bits of text with the center baseline

    addison: @@1
    … I see the non-centeredness of it on Firefox

    addison: I think the glyph does that

    [addison shares screen]

    [r12a shares screen]

    addison: is there any objection?

   Merge: Language negotiation

    r12a: I started writing an article about how to make oblique
    text lean in the writing direction of rtl scripts
    … lean to the left rather than to the right
    … which is a bit problematic at the moment
    … I don't know whether that's still a useful thing to write up

    addison: it may have a short shelf life

    r12a: it might be useful for other people to better understand
    the situation too

    addison: if you've done the work, then putting it somewhere is
    maybe a good idea

    [42]i18n-drafts#581

      [42] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-drafts/issues/581

    <gb> [43]Pull Request 581 Initial work on language-negotiation
    materials (by aphillips)

      [43] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-drafts/pull/581

    addison: we don't really have a blog

    [44]https://github.com/aphillips/i18n-drafts/blob/gh-pages/
    articles/language-negotiation/language-negotiation.md

      [44] 
https://github.com/aphillips/i18n-drafts/blob/gh-pages/articles/language-negotiation/language-negotiation.md

    addison: my article on language and locale negotiation ^
    … I'm not perfectly happy with this
    … I don't like my long example table
    … other than that, I think it's got most of the info in it
    … I'd like to merge the Markdown into our repo and then work on
    the conversion
    … to HTML

    ACTION: addison: remind everyone to read the language
    negotiation article

    <gb> Created [45]action #144

      [45] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/144

   Publish DNOTE: Working with Time and Timezones

    [46]https://w3c.github.io/timezone/

      [46] https://w3c.github.io/timezone/

    addison: there is the current draft which has all of the
    material ^
    … do you all want to consider it some more before we make it a
    draft note?

    r12a: it may need a Contributors section at the beginning of
    the Introduction

    addison: there's an Acknowledgements section

    r12a: yeah, but we agreed to start putting that stuff at the
    top of the document

    addison: much of that is preserved from the past

    addison: I'll add Richard

    [47]https://www.w3.org/TR/clreq/#contributors

      [47] https://www.w3.org/TR/clreq/#contributors

    xfq: see clreq Contributors section

    addison: do I just get rid of the Acknowledgements section?
    … and just turn it into Contributors?

    r12a: yeah

    <r12a> [48]https://www.w3.org/TR/alreq/#h_acknowledgements

      [48] https://www.w3.org/TR/alreq/#h_acknowledgements

    r12a: I kept the ID for alreq

    addison: or I could double ID for the section

    ACTION: addison: publish timezone for wide review

    <gb> Created [49]action #145

      [49] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/145

    addison: I'll publish it with Contributors

   AOB?

    addison: do y'all want to have a meeting next week?
    … next week is US holiday, Thanksgiving
    … the Christmas holiday falls the day before this call in that
    week
    … in the last full week of this year
    … anybody want to have a meeting that week or shall I cancel
    that one?
    … and also the meeting of Jan 2
    … any objection to removing those?

    r12a: not for me

    addison: all right, so I'll cancel those two calls
    … if memory serves, the CSS call is on the 24th

    ACTION: addison: create new calendar entry for I18N+CSS

    r12a: maybe remove that one

    <gb> Created [50]action #146

      [50] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-actions/issues/146

Summary of action items

     1. [51]addison: make comments on the encoding issue attached
        to i18n-activity#1940
     2. [52]addison: remind everyone to read the language
        negotiation article
     3. [53]addison: publish timezone for wide review
     4. [54]addison: create new calendar entry for I18N+CSS

Received on Friday, 22 November 2024 01:55:36 UTC