- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 18:57:24 +0000
- To: www-international@w3.org
- Message-ID: <b261b173-29fb-609d-3bbe-26824bc5f968@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/2021/11/11-i18n-minutes.html
– DRAFT –
Internationalization Working Group Teleconference
11 November 2021
[2]Agenda. [3]IRC log.
[2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2021Nov/0020.html
[3] https://www.w3.org/2021/11/11-i18n-irc
Attendees
Present
addison, Atsushi, Fuqiao, JcK, Richard
Regrets
Fátima, JcK
Chair
Addison Phillips
Scribe
addison, xfq
Contents
1. [4]Agenda Review
2. [5]Action Items
3. [6]Info Share
4. [7]RADAR Review
5. [8]Close User-Timing HR issue
6. [9]EPUB
7. [10]awaiting comment resolution: how to handle
8. [11]AOB?
9. [12]Summary of action items
Meeting minutes
<addison> trackbot, prepare teleconference
Agenda Review
Action Items
<addison> [13]https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/
open
[13] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
addison: 1034, should we add that to the agenda?
<addison> action-1092?
<trackbot> [14]action-1092: Addison Phillips to File review
approving payment request text plus personal comment on 'may'
-- due 2021-11-11 -- OPEN
[14] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/1092
<addison> close action-1092
<trackbot> Closed action-1092.
addison: did 1092
<addison> action-1094?
<trackbot> [15]action-1094: Addison Phillips to Start
conversation with ecma-402 et al about webidl work -- due
2021-11-11 -- OPEN
[15] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/1094
addison: did 1094
… sent an email
… need to follow up
… until they reply
Info Share
<addison> xfq: process 2021, one thing plh mentioned is
cleaning TR docs
<addison> ... there is a separate note track, should republish
our WDs as DRAFT-NOTE
r12a: no need for an action item, we can do it when we @@
addison: what's the status of specdev? note or draft?
r12a: draft
<atsushi> `DNOTE`
RADAR Review
[16]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/projects/1
[16] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/projects/1
addison: no incoming requests
… moving IFT to awaiting comment resolution
Close User-Timing HR issue
[17]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/
2021Nov/0016.html
[17] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2021Nov/0016.html
[18]https://github.com/w3c/user-timing/issues/80
[18] https://github.com/w3c/user-timing/issues/80
[19]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/1392
[19] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/1392
atsushi: they updated the spec
… I think we can close this
addison: looks good to me
… any objection?
[silence]
addison: I'm going to move it to Completed
[20]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/issues/156
[20] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/issues/156
xfq: ^ we moved Performance Timeline to Completed
… can we close this issue?
r12a: this should have been closed when we moved it to
Completed
addison: i thought he was looking at the needs-resolution
issues
r12a: I'll close it
EPUB
[21]https://github.com/w3c/epub-specs/issues/1885
[21] https://github.com/w3c/epub-specs/issues/1885
[22]https://github.com/w3c/epub-specs/pull/1899/files
[22] https://github.com/w3c/epub-specs/pull/1899/files
xfq: raised an issue ^^
… about their their file name restrictions
… might prevent the use of emoji
[23]https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/epub-specs/1899/
da13601...d1c5ad3.html#sec-container-filenames
[23] https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/epub-specs/1899/da13601...d1c5ad3.html#sec-container-filenames
xfq: added some text
r12a: there's a whole bunch of variation selectors
addison: those are not super common used
r12a: Ideographic Variation Selectors
[24]https://github.com/w3c/epub-specs/pull/1899
[24] https://github.com/w3c/epub-specs/pull/1899
addison: i could make a case for almost all of them being a
problem if you use it in a file name
… we have one block they've excluded because they though they
used to be deprecated
… If there is a problem with the system, then we need to fix
the reading system or operating system
r12a: language tags should be excluded
… there are also Ideographic Variation Selectors
addison: I just made a file that contains flag emoji and
variation selectors
… at least on Windows there's no restrictions
<r12a> [25]https://r12a.github.io/uniview/?block=Tags
[25] https://r12a.github.io/uniview/?block=Tags
<r12a> [26]https://r12a.github.io/
uniview/?block=Variation_selectors_supplement
[26] https://r12a.github.io/uniview/?block=Variation_selectors_supplement
addison: excluding unassigned characters with no block
assignment is a no-no
… maybe exclude U+E0001 and U+E007F
… but i don't think file systems care about them
… they're just a bad idea
xfq: I'll comment
awaiting comment resolution: how to handle
addison: previously i've gone through the items awaiting
comment resolution
… to see the open issues and made a list
… i feel that it's not effective process
r12a: partly because we need advanced notice of what will be
discussed during the telecon
addison: i can go back and redo it and make a list of issues
… will that be effective?
… we would need to pre-read
… if i see items that can be closed, i'll close and send an
email to the list
… assuming we go through and clean up our backlog
… how do we want to handle this going forward?
r12a: we had a shepherd
… i keep coming across issues you raised, addison, and i would
need you to decide whether you're satisfied with that issue
addison: if the item has an owner then at least that owner can
come and say can we close that issue
addison: a lot of them have owners
r12a: @@
<r12a> [27]https://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/reviews/#
[27] https://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/reviews/
ACTION: richard: go through all issues that are
needs-resolution and compare to awaiting comment resolution and
create list of unassigned specs
addison: will reply to Wendy
AOB?
ACTION: richard to go through all issues that are
needs-resolution and compare to awaiting comment resolution and
create list of unassigned specs
ACTION: r12a to go through all issues that are needs-resolution
and compare to awaiting comment resolution and create list of
unassigned specs
<trackbot> Created ACTION-1095 - Go through all issues that are
needs-resolution and compare to awaiting comment resolution and
create list of unassigned specs [on Richard Ishida - due
2021-11-18].
Summary of action items
1. [28]richard: go through all issues that are
needs-resolution and compare to awaiting comment resolution
and create list of unassigned specs
2. [29]richard to go through all issues that are
needs-resolution and compare to awaiting comment resolution
and create list of unassigned specs
3. [30]r12a to go through all issues that are needs-resolution
and compare to awaiting comment resolution and create list
of unassigned specs
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2021 18:57:33 UTC