- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 17:25:47 +0100
- To: www-international@w3.org
- Message-ID: <2982b218-f7ce-7d3c-3923-565cfb6322aa@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/2021/08/19-i18n-minutes.html
– DRAFT –
Internationalization Working Group Teleconference
19 August 2021
[2]Agenda. [3]IRC log.
[2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2021Aug/0009.html
[3] https://www.w3.org/2021/08/19-i18n-irc
Attendees
Present
Addison, Atsushi, Bert, Felix, Fuqiao, JcK, r12a
Regrets
-
Chair
Addison Phillips
Scribe
xfq
Contents
1. [4]Agenda Review
2. [5]Action Items
3. [6]Info Share
4. [7]RADAR Review
5. [8]Remove links to Encoding tests in i18n test suite
6. [9]IPv6 Zone identifiers, i18n, and URIs
7. [10]"Awaiting Comment Resolution" reviews
8. [11]AOB?
9. [12]Summary of action items
Meeting minutes
<addison> trackbot, prepare teleconference
Agenda Review
addison: anything else to add to the agenda?
Action Items
<addison> [13]https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/
open
[13] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
<addison> action-1050?
<trackbot> [14]action-1050: Addison Phillips to Merge
string-meta changes pending richard's review of the glossary
changes -- due 2021-07-22 -- OPEN
[14] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/1050
<addison> close action-1050
<trackbot> Closed action-1050.
<addison> action-1055?
<trackbot> [15]action-1055: Addison Phillips to Publish
localizable-manifests as fpwd with help from richard -- due
2021-08-05 -- OPEN
[15] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/1055
addison: "Publish localizable-manifests as fpwd with help from
richard" is not quite done but I think we're in good shape,
mostly thanks to Richard
Info Share
<atsushi> [16]https://github.com/CITPCSHARE/UAX50/wiki/
Request-to-revise-UAX-50-for-the-harmonization-with-Adobe-Japan
1
[16] https://github.com/CITPCSHARE/UAX50/wiki/Request-to-revise-UAX-50-for-the-harmonization-with-Adobe-Japan1
atsushi: discrepancy between UAX 50 and Adobe-Japan1
… 4 code points
… any comment is welcome
… the discussions were in Japanese, but the conclusion in this
document is in English
addison: is this somewhat final?
atsushi:
Japanese Character Information Technology Promotion Council
<atsushi> [17]https://moji.or.jp/
[17] https://moji.or.jp/
atsushi: CITPC
… will send it to the UTC
r12a: it would be good at least to say somewhere in this
proposal that it is developed by the jlreq TF in W3C
addison: the power of standards is that you can get support
from a wider community
atsushi: let me propose to the TF chair, Kida-san
atsushi: Tatsuo Kobayashi is managing CITPC
r12a: not everyone in CITPC is a participant of i18n WG/IG
… will it be sent to the Unicode Consortium?
atsushi: yes
Action: atsushi: follow up on CITPC/JLTF request to UTC about 4
characters and bring doc for review by WG when ready
<trackbot> Created ACTION-1060 - Follow up on citpc/jltf
request to utc about 4 characters and bring doc for review by
wg when ready [on Atsushi Shimono - due 2021-08-26].
r12a: I'm now not only on the Unicode Editorial Committee, but
also on the Script Ad Hoc Group
RADAR Review
<addison> [18]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/projects/1
[18] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/projects/1
xfq: no comment on CSS Masking Module Level 1
Remove links to Encoding tests in i18n test suite
<r12a> [19]https://www.w3.org/International/
i18n-tests/#encoding-spec
[19] https://www.w3.org/International/i18n-tests/#encoding-spec
r12a: somebody raised an issue recently
… the tests in wpt and i18n-tests are not consistent
… keeping them in sync takes hours and hours
addison: they're mostly tests for truly dead legacy encodings
… I have no objections since WHATWG is maintaining the Encoding
Standard
Action: richard: remove encoding tests and put a link to wpt
tests
<trackbot> Created ACTION-1061 - Remove encoding tests and put
a link to wpt tests [on Richard Ishida - due 2021-08-26].
IPv6 Zone identifiers, i18n, and URIs
JcK: ipv6 tries to eliminate NAT mapping
JcK: they have been trying to look at what WHATWG is doing
… URI and IRI as @@ understands them, and URL as WHATWG
understands them
addison: if they're going to allow non-ascii address they have
to address all the considerations in IDNA addresses
JcK: yes
addison: what WHATWG is doing is trying to describe what the
browsers do
… I suppose browsers support this
addison: i guess as a WG we just kind of wait for them to
respond
… i can't think of any other actions
"Awaiting Comment Resolution" reviews
<addison> [20]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/
issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3As%3Aintersection-observer
[20] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:s:intersection-observer
<addison> keep spec open
<addison> [21]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/
issues?q=is%3Aissue++label%3As%3Acss-text-decor
[21] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?q=is:issue++label:s:css-text-decor
addison: do we need someone to look at them more closely?
Action: richard: review open css-text-decor issues for close or
escalation
<trackbot> Created ACTION-1062 - Review open css-text-decor
issues for close or escalation [on Richard Ishida - due
2021-08-26].
r12a: i'll do it
<addison> [22]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/
issues?q=is%3Aissue++label%3As%3Acss-align
[22] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?q=is:issue++label:s:css-align
<addison> [23]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/
issues?q=is%3Aissue++label%3As%3Avocab-dcat+is%3Aopen
[23] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?q=is:issue++label:s:vocab-dcat+is:open
addison: vocab-dcat
… two open issues
r12a: back to css-align
[24]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/473
[24] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/473
addison: it's closed
fsasaki: I can take a look at vocab-dcat
[25]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/709
[25] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/709
addison: we requested some health warning on references to
ISO-639 vs. BCP47
Action: addison: respond to vocab-dcat issues pinging for
updates
<trackbot> Created ACTION-1063 - Respond to vocab-dcat issues
pinging for updates [on Addison Phillips - due 2021-08-26].
Action: felix: propose health warning text on vocab-dcat and
language
<trackbot> Created ACTION-1064 - Propose health warning text on
vocab-dcat and language [on Felix Sasaki - due 2021-08-26].
addison: they said they would create a draft PR in Oct 2019 but
there doesn't seem to be one
<addison> [26]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/
issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3As%3Alow-vi
sion-needs
[26] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?utf8=✓&q=is:issue+is:open+label:s:low-vision-needs
addison: low-vision-needs
… reviewed in 2017
addison: should i ping the WG to see if they intend to progress
this further?
Action: addison: ping a11y to see if they intend to progress
low-vision-needs
<trackbot> Created ACTION-1065 - Ping a11y to see if they
intend to progress low-vision-needs [on Addison Phillips - due
2021-08-26].
<addison> [27]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/
issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3As%3Alow-vi
sion-needs
[27] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?utf8=✓&q=is:issue+is:open+label:s:low-vision-needs
JcK: low vision @@ font families
<addison> [28]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/
issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3As%3Ajson-ld
[28] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:s:json-ld
addison: JSON-LD
… we spent a lot of effort
… they did a bunch of work for us
… should we close this and call that review completed?
<fsasaki> +1
<atsushi> +1
<addison> [29]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/
issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+label%3As%3Apronunciation-ga
p-analysis+is%3Aopen
[29] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?utf8=✓&q=is:issue+label:s:pronunciation-gap-analysis+is:open
r12a: shall I close them?
addison: yes, please
addison: this one's gonna be fun
… published as a working group note
… though these four issues have not been addressed
r12a: is the note the end target?
addison: it's called Pronunciation Gap Analysis
… so I guess it's the end status
r12a: whether we need to port these comments to the WD
addison: i don't think we have reviewed that doc
Action: richard: move pronunciation-gap-analysis issues to new
document
<trackbot> Created ACTION-1066 - Move
pronunciation-gap-analysis issues to new document [on Richard
Ishida - due 2021-08-26].
AOB?
<r12a> [30]https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC/2021/GroupMeetings
[30] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC/2021/GroupMeetings
r12a: set a time for TPAC meeting
addison: i'll add an agenda item next week to discuss that
r12a: probably be several meetings
[adjourned]
Summary of action items
1. [31]atsushi: follow up on CITPC/JLTF request to UTC about 4
characters and bring doc for review by WG when ready
2. [32]richard: remove encoding tests and put a link to wpt
tests
3. [33]richard: review open css-text-decor issues for close or
escalation
4. [34]addison: respond to vocab-dcat issues pinging for
updates
5. [35]felix: propose health warning text on vocab-dcat and
language
6. [36]addison: ping a11y to see if they intend to progress
low-vision-needs
7. [37]richard: move pronunciation-gap-analysis issues to new
document
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2021 16:25:55 UTC