Re: REQUEST for (updated?) review: Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0

We understand.  Thank you.

-- dan

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 12:42 PM Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
wrote:

> Hello Daniel and Verifiable Claims WG,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the request. I have added your spec to our review radar [1].
>
>
>
> Please note that 2 weeks really is not enough time for I18N to do a
> review. We will do our best to accommodate (and given that we had no
> comments last time, this may remain a no-op), but you should also note that
> this gives you little time to react to any comments we give.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Addison
>
>
>
> Addison Phillips
>
> Sr. Principal SDE – I18N (Amazon)
>
> Chair (W3C I18N WG)
>
>
>
> Internationalization is not a feature.
>
> It is an architecture.
>
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/projects/1
>
>       [a] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/636
>
>
>
> *From:* Daniel Burnett [mailto:daniel.burnett@consensys.net]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 18, 2019 5:39 AM
> *To:* www-international@w3.org
> *Cc:* Matt Stone <mstone@thebrightlink.com>; Manu Sporny <
> msporny@digitalbazaar.com>; Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>;
> Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>; Grant Noble <
> grant.noble@consensys.net>
> *Subject:* REQUEST for (updated?) review: Verifiable Credentials Data
> Model 1.0
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> The Verifiable Claims Working Group's one standards-track specification,
> "Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0", has some editorial work to go but
> is otherwise ready for Candidate Recommendation.
>
>
>
> I don't believe we received any comments from you after our request last
> year, but we would like to offer another opportunity for comments or
> questions.  In particular, based on community feedback we have added two
> new features to the specification, a new JWT-based syntactic representation
> [1] and support for Zero-Knowledge Proofs [2].  A broader list of changes
> can be found in the "Status of this Document" section of the most recently
> published static Working Draft [3].
>
>
>
> As before, the best place for comments is directly in our GitHub repo [4]
> as new issues, but comments sent to our comments mailing list [5] work as
> well.  It would be best to base any review and comments on the live
> Editor's Draft [6].  Given that our Working Group charter expires at the
> end of March, and that we are expected to publish the Candidate
> Recommendation before then, we would greatly appreciate any comments you
> can give us by **March 4th, 2019** .
>
>
>
> If you need anything else from us, please don't hesitate to contact the
> chairs directly.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Dan Burnett and Matt Stone, Co-chairs, Verifiable Claims Working Group
>
>
>
> CC: Specification editors
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] JWT:  https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/#json-web-token
>
> [2] ZKP:  https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/#zero-knowledge-proofs
>
> [3] Most recent dated (fixed) draft:
> https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/WD-verifiable-claims-data-model-20190208/
>
> [4] GitHub repo:  https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model
>
> [5] Mailing list:  public-vc-comments@w3.org
>
> [6] Tip of tree editor's draft:  https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/
>
>
>