- From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 22:45:34 +0000
- To: Matitiahu Allouche <matitiahu.allouche@gmail.com>, "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 16 July 2017 22:46:03 UTC
Agreed. Here’s the replacement: <p>If directional information is contained in markup that will be parsed as such by the consumer (for example, <code class="kw" translate="no">dir=rtl</code> in HTML), the producer of the string needs to understand that markup in order to set or not set an RLM/LRM character as appropriate. If the producer always adds RLM/LRM to the start of such strings, the consumer is expected to know that. If the producer relies instead on the markup being understood, the consumer is expected to understand the markup.</p> From: Matitiahu Allouche [mailto:matitiahu.allouche@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2017 3:45 PM To: www-international@w3.org Subject: Comment on Requirements for Language and Direction Metadata in Data Formats (Editor's Draft 13 July 2017) In 4.4, we find "if it relies instead on the markup…". It is not clear what is referenced by "it". The nearest term is the consumer, but the intended reference probably is the producer, which is mentioned further above. Shalom (Regards), Mati
Received on Sunday, 16 July 2017 22:46:03 UTC