RE: Requesting I18N review of POE WG Deliverables

Hello Renato,

Thanks for this request. I have added your documents to our review radar [1].

Please note that your schedule will be difficult for the WG to meet. It is very difficult to complete a review in only about two weeks and if there were comments, you'd have no time to respond to them. We have other reviews in the queue as well. For future reference, you are strongly urged to seek I18N review as early in the process as is practical, but at a minimum please try to leave us 4 weeks.

Regards (for I18N),

Addison

Addison Phillips
Principal SDE, I18N Architect (Amazon)
Chair (W3C I18N WG)

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.

[1] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/projects/1

From: Renato Iannella [mailto:renato.iannella@monegraph.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 5:19 PM
To: www-international@w3.org
Cc: POE Comment list <public-poe-comments@w3.org>
Subject: Requesting I18N review of POE WG Deliverables

Hi I18N IG, the W3C Permissions and Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group would welcome review of the editors drafts:
 - ODRL Information Model <https://w3c.github.io/poe/model/>
 - ODRL Vocabulary & Expression <https://w3c.github.io/poe/vocab/>
as we begin preparing for transition to CR.

We've completed the self-questionnaire and attached the response (PDF document).

We have not found any significant issues as we use IRIs, UTF-8 encoding, XSD datatypes for date/time, and BCP47 for language codes.

If there are any issues from the I18N IG, then we would appreciate comments by 15 May 2017 (as we meet that week in a F2F to finalise CR).
Also see the Wide Review details attached below for feedback options.

Many thanks in advance...


Renato Iannella, Monegraph
Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group