- From: <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 17:27:37 +0100
- To: www International <www-international@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html
text version follows:
Internationalization Working Group Teleconference
02 Jun 2016
[2]Agenda
[2]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2016May/0033.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-irc
Attendees
Present
Addison, Richard, Steve_(partial), Najib
Regrets
Felix, JcK
Chair
Addison Phillips
Scribe
Addison Phillips
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Agenda
2. [6]Action Items
3. [7]Info Share
4. [8]HTML 5.1 Review
5. [9]How to stop WGs following the old LC model
6. [10]proposed deprecation: Dates and Time
7. [11]Web Annotations (further discussion)
* [12]Summary of Action Items
* [13]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
Agenda
Action Items
<aphillip_>
[14]https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
[14] https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
<aphillip_> close action-174
<trackbot> Closed action-174.
<aphillip_> close action-363
<trackbot> Closed action-363.
<aphillip_> close action-524
<trackbot> Closed action-524.
<aphillip_> close action-525
<trackbot> Closed action-525.
<aphillip_> close action-527
<trackbot> Closed action-527.
Info Share
<r12a> [15]http://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/reviews/
[15] http://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/reviews/
HTML 5.1 Review
[16]http://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/reviews/
[16] http://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/reviews/
[17]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/157
[17] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/157
steve: the introduce a term "plain unicode string"
... is there a difference from just a string?
A Unicode or binary string, in some cases with a file name
(itself a Unicode string), as per the drag data item kind.
richard: vote to send on
addison: +1
[18]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/158
[18] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/158
accesskey not validatable?
steve: propose text
[19]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/159
[19] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/159
addison: think case-insensitive is wrong here
richard: meant to say case sensitive
[20]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/160
[20] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/160
If the resulting value is not a recognized language tag, then
it must be treated as an unknown language having the given
language tag, distinct from all other languages. For the
purposes of round-tripping or communicating with other services
that expect language tags, user agents should pass unknown
language tags through unmodified, and tagged as being BCP 47
language tags, so that subsequent services do not interpret the
data as another type of language[CUT]
don't send 160
[21]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/161
[21] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/161
hasn't changed
not ideal situation, but based on previous disucssion, no
change
don't send 161
najib: doesn't matter about case, case insensitive, right?
addison: meant to be case insensitive
In the current HTML5.1 spec, the input type=datetime-local
value is back. However the floating time language is present.
Removing datetime-local from 5.0 may not have been the best
move, since I later learned that type was widely used on mobile
devices. So, we have interop with Edge, and Chrome implement,
Firefox stable does not, not sure about Safari. Seems a little
heavy-handed now to remove it.
<scribe> ACTION: addison: look into issue 123 and update as
needed [recorded in
[22]http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action01]
[22] http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-528 - Look into issue 123 and update
as needed [on Addison Phillips - due 2016-06-09].
[23]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/122
[23] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/122
forward 122
<scribe> ACTION: addison: forward issue 122 to html [recorded
in [24]http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action02]
[24] http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-529 - Forward issue 122 to html [on
Addison Phillips - due 2016-06-09].
[25]https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/128
[25] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/128
[26]https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/230
[26] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/230
How to stop WGs following the old LC model
<scribe> ACTION: addison: write to chairs@ with a note saying
effectively "don't follow old LC model, giving us no time to
react" [recorded in
[27]http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action03]
[27] http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-530 - Write to chairs@ with a note
saying effectively "don't follow old lc model, giving us no
time to react" [on Addison Phillips - due 2016-06-09].
richard: 1. have a look at self-review checklist
... and 2. and ask for review at FPWD
... and 3. don't leave a small amount of time before CR
addison: should horizontal review be a process step earlier??
<scribe> ACTION: richard: add big orange box link for "how to
get a review" and pointer to spec dev [recorded in
[28]http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action04]
[28] http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-531 - Add big orange box link for
"how to get a review" and pointer to spec dev [on Richard
Ishida - due 2016-06-09].
proposed deprecation: Dates and Time
addison: park new terminology here?
richard: inclined to put in a new location and put this out to
pasture
[29]https://www.w3.org/International/O-time
[29] https://www.w3.org/International/O-time
<scribe> ACTION: richard: send a note to www-international
asking for last call on deprecation of O-time and deprecate if
no objection [recorded in
[30]http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action05]
[30] http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-532 - Send a note to
www-international asking for last call on deprecation of o-time
and deprecate if no objection [on Richard Ishida - due
2016-06-09].
Web Annotations (further discussion)
<r12a> [31]https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/227
[31] https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/227
(after discussion) just remove bogus normalizaiton requirement
paragraph?
normalize to do comparisons
<scribe> ACTION: addison: update web-annotation 227 to say that
WG thinks the normalization requirements should be removed and
a health warning to do normalization on comparison might be
needed [recorded in
[32]http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action06]
[32] http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action06]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-533 - Update web-annotation 227 to
say that wg thinks the normalization requirements should be
removed and a health warning to do normalization on comparison
might be needed [on Addison Phillips - due 2016-06-09].
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: addison: forward issue 122 to html [recorded in
[33]http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: addison: look into issue 123 and update as needed
[recorded in
[34]http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: addison: update web-annotation 227 to say that WG
thinks the normalization requirements should be removed and a
health warning to do normalization on comparison might be
needed [recorded in
[35]http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action06]
[NEW] ACTION: addison: write to chairs@ with a note saying
effectively "don't follow old LC model, giving us no time to
react" [recorded in
[36]http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: richard: add big orange box link for "how to get
a review" and pointer to spec dev [recorded in
[37]http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: richard: send a note to www-international asking
for last call on deprecation of O-time and deprecate if no
objection [recorded in
[38]http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action05]
[33] http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action02
[34] http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action01
[35] http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action06
[36] http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action03
[37] http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action04
[38] http://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-i18n-minutes.html#action05
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2016 16:27:53 UTC