- From: <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 13:10:00 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
On 07/04/2016 21:26, fantasai wrote: > I think that depends a bit on what you're doing with the quotes. > Nested speaker quotations maybe, but quotation marks are also > used for things like titles, "air quotes", and other effects > which imho seem to work better if we don't jump contexts. the latter are not what i have in mind at the moment. I'm actually focused on things for which you would use the q tag, described in HTML5 as: <q cite="https://www.w3.org/TR/html5/text-level-semantics.html#the-q-element">The q element represents some phrasing content quoted from another source.</q> and further described by: <q>The q element must not be used in place of quotation marks that do not represent quotes; for example, it is inappropriate to use the q element for marking up sarcastic statements.</q> (that said, i also tend to use markup to identify other things i want to surround with quote marks in certain contexts (eg. <span class='qterm'>..</span> or <span class='qchar'>..</span>), but those tend to be simpler (no secondary quote marks), and they are differentiated semantically and stylistically.) > I think this is *especially* true if considering a non-CJK > fragment inside a CJK paragraph. Using CJK quotation marks > inside a Latin segment would look very disruptive. > > Between this and the fact that it's not that easy to determine > the "context" language (is it lang on <html>? what about <body>? > what about <article> or <section>? what about <blockquote> or > <p>? what about <div>?), I think the rules in the CSS spec (use > the language of the immediately- surrounding text) is the best > default behavior. Well, if the algorithm to detect the language looks for the language that surrounds the primary quotation markup, then maybe that's adequate. See below. > Authors can always adjust if they want something more specific. > >> Perhaps what we need is a CSS rule that says, 'If you're not >> inside a q element, then set the quotes per the language outside >> the quote; but if you are inside, ignore the language info.' >> >> I'm not quite sure how to say that in selector-speak yet. > > [lang] { quotes: whatever; } > q, q [lang] { quotes: inherit; } > > (You need to make the second rule more specific than the first, > though, by adding some always-matching selectors or somesuch.) Florian's syntax seems to work(?). ri
Received on Friday, 8 April 2016 12:10:13 UTC