- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 19:43:19 +0000
- To: www-international@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27235
Bug ID: 27235
Summary: Bring back gbk encoder
Product: WHATWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Encoding
Assignee: annevk@annevk.nl
Reporter: annevk@annevk.nl
QA Contact: sideshowbarker+encodingspec@gmail.com
CC: hsivonen@hsivonen.fi, jsbell@google.com,
jshin@chromium.org, mike@w3.org, travil@microsoft.com,
www-international@w3.org
Firefox ended up not following the plan from bug 16862 comment 18. Its gbk
decoder is identical to its gb18030 decoder, but its gbk encoder per
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=951691 is distinct.
So we should probably bring the gbk encoder back. When fixing this we should
pay attention to the EURO sign and PUA code points. See
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=951691#c16
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=951691#c19
Having said that, if other browsers meanwhile converged on not having a
distinct gbk encoder, perhaps Firefox should revisit its approach. Input
welcome.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2014 19:43:20 UTC