- From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: WWW International <www-international@w3.org>, www-style@w3.org
fantasai wrote: > I think there are three classes of guidelines here, actually: > > 1. Must not break shaping. (No style change case. You have no excuse.) > 2. Should not break shaping, if possible. YMMV depending on > implementation/font technology. Less breakage = better. > 3. Must break shaping. > > And I think we should be able to give interoperable results > on 1 and 3. Yeah, I think this makes sense. There may cases here where shaping shouldn't break but the final presentation may be tricky. For example, color changes within a pair of characters that form a ligature. For this situation I don't think you can say anything other than implementations make a "best effort" to display something sensible. Gecko solves the color change by coloring 1/nth of the resulting ligature formed from n characters. Sorta works sometimes but calling this a hack is certainly fair. :) John Daggett Mozilla Japan
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 01:46:14 UTC