- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:54:50 +0200
- To: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Cc: "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:10 PM, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: > That would allow us to shave one more bit off the maximum, so you could > write "at least twenty-one bits precision" :-). Of course this one bit is > completely irrelevant, but logical shift is conceptually the right thing to > use. I'm sorry I didn't get there immediately. https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/commit/a447fa7d289e6e8f863e9403b69604876178d58e > If I have an initial, it's J., but I don't always use it, so you can save > that time/commit for something more important. But thanks for checking > anyway. It's really no big deal to try to get this right in exchange for all the great feedback. Let me know if you change your mind ;-) -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 16:55:17 UTC