The Internationalization WG has reviewed the responses to the issue mentioned in the quote just below (from the CSS3 Syntax CR transition request [2]) in our teleconference today [1]. The WG has accepted the changes that were made to clarify the handling of @charset and that further changes to allow a more-permissive @charset syntax have been rejected. As a result, all I18N comments have been satisfactorily addressed. Thanks! Addison (for I18N) Addison Phillips Globalization Architect (Amazon Lab126) Chair (W3C I18N WG) Internationalization is not a feature. It is an architecture. [1] http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-i18n-minutes.html#item07 [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2014JanMar/0086.html > * Evidence that issues have been formally addressed > > See the DoC: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-syntax/issues-LC-20131105 > > One comment (issue 3) was rejected and the commenters so far neither > accepted nor objected, although they said they expect to object still.Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 21:13:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 21 September 2016 22:37:36 UTC