W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: [css-syntax] ISSUE-329: @charset has no effect on stylesheet??

From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:32:13 -0800
Message-ID: <52E3D8FD.9080103@exyr.org>
To: Andrew Cunningham <acunningham@slv.vic.gov.au>
CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, www International <www-international@w3.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
On 24/01/2014 21:40, Andrew Cunningham wrote:
> On 23/01/2014 8:30 AM, "Simon Sapin" <simon.sapin@exyr.org
> <mailto:simon.sapin@exyr.org>> wrote:
>  >
>  > On 22/01/2014 12:25, Phillips, Addison wrote:
>  >>
>  > I personally don’t care about being friendly to authors who are not
> using UTF-8.
>  >
>  > The only thing we should teach authors is "Use UTF-8, period."
>  >
> Considering NO web browser supports all of Unicode and NO web browser
> supports a wide enough range of languages...

Could you explain what you mean by that?

> It begs the question why should utf-8  be used exclusively ?
> I would prefer to use utf-8 exclusively.  But I have to work with a wide
> range of languages. Some have limited or no support even though they are
> in Unicode. Some aren't even in Unicode yet.  Some need missing
> characters added to Unicode before they could be widely used.
> Some can only be implemented as Graphite fonts,  OpenType implentations
> aren't up to rendering them yet.

What encoding would you use instead of UTF-8? How does it help?

UTF-8 (which is only about the byte representation of abstract code 
points) supports the full range of Unicode. This is not at all related 
to whether a given font stack supports shaping or other features for a 
given language.

As to languages that are not in Unicode yet, the fix is to add them to 
Unicode. This is not a responsibility for CSS Syntax. Text on the Web is 
fundamentally based on Unicode, this is not gonna change.

In any case, it’s fine that you use a different encoding if you think 
you have a good reason to do so. That doesn’t change that we should 
teach the vast majority of web authors to just use UTF-8.

Simon Sapin
Received on Saturday, 25 January 2014 15:37:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:41:04 UTC