W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > October to December 2013

RE: [counter-styles] i18n-ISSUE-281: Problems with example 12

From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 04:54:57 +0000
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
CC: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7C0AF84C6D560544A17DDDEB68A9DFB517166DFE@ex10-mbx-36006.ant.amazon.com>
Hi Tab,

Regarding:

> Done, though I'm not sure what difference you think there is between
> simplified and traditional.  Other than the negative sign, both formals are
> identical, as are both informals.

The difference is between the two formals:

zh-Hant: 9678 4EDF 96F6 58F9
zh-Hans: 9646 4EDF 96F6 58F9

Notice the simplified code point (U+9646) in the second one, as compared to the traditional code point (U+9678) in the first one.

Addison

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 6:44 PM
> To: Richard Ishida
> Cc: W3C Style; www International
> Subject: Re: [counter-styles] i18n-ISSUE-281: Problems with example 12
> 
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org> wrote:
> > Raised by:
> >     Richard Ishida
> >
> >
> > 7.1 Longhand East Asian Counter Styles
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/css-counter-styles-3/#complex-cjk

> > Example 12
> >
> > The examples of japanese-informal for 10, 11, 100, and 101 are
> > incorrect - there should be no δΈ€ (digit one) on the left.
> >
> > Same for the hanja-informal.
> >
> > The hanja-informal also uses the wrong symbol for zero (should be the
> > han character rather than the hangul character.)
> 
> Thanks, all fixed.
> 
> > I also suggest that you include a column for 6001. This shows a
> > difference between simplified and traditional chinese, and shows how
> > the zeros collapse in the chinese methods.
> 
> Done, though I'm not sure what difference you think there is between
> simplified and traditional.  Other than the negative sign, both formals are
> identical, as are both informals.
> 
> ~TJ

Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 04:55:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 21 September 2016 22:37:35 UTC