- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 16:30:38 +0100
- To: MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>
- CC: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, public-i18n-cjk@w3.org, www International <www-international@w3.org>
Hi, On 03/03/2013 15:09 , MURAKAMI Shinyu wrote: > BTW, we (Antenna House) have a ruby implementation supporting > jukugo ruby (HTML5 syntax, rb.rt.rb.rt, <rb> is optional) > and double-sided ruby (nesting and ruby-position property): Can you please clarify what you mean by "HTML5 syntax"? I ask because HTML5 as currently standing does not have <rb>. Are you mostly talking about using an HTML parser? > I don't have strong opinion for the grouped rb (rb.rb.rt.rt) model, > but if I have to support it I want to reuse the existing HTML5 model > formatting algorithm and first reorder the internal object sequence > (rb.rb.rt.rt to rb.rt.rb.rt) and then process HTML5 model way. The proposal to support grouping with rb.rb.rt.rt is made with the goal of becoming the HTML5 model (by replacing/extending the current one — and notably adding <rb>). I'm curious: would you alwayds reorder anyway and never make use of the grouping information for rendering? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2013 15:30:51 UTC