- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:27:16 -0800
- To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
- CC: "CSS WWW Style (www-style@w3.org)" <www-style@w3.org>, "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>
On 02/04/2013 06:15 PM, fantasai wrote: > On 02/02/2013 12:29 PM, fantasai wrote: >> On 02/01/2013 01:10 PM, Phillips, Addison wrote: >>> >>> These comments are tracked: https://www.w3.org/International/track/products/36 >>> >>> [I18N-ISSUE-248] >>> >>> 2.5 "text-decoration-skip": the value "spaces" is defined as: >>> >>> -- >>> Skip white space: this includes regular spaces (U+0020) and tabs (U+0009), as well as nbsp (U+00A0), ideographic space >>> (U+3000), all fixed width spaces (such as U+2000–U+200A, U+202F and U+205F), and any adjacent letter-spacing or word-spacing. >>> -- >> >> I noticed your original comments to the i18nwg also included >> " - this is an incomplete looking definition. Define to include all whitespace?" >> >> So I also made the change to include all of Unicode general category Z. >> I'm not sure if this is correct for the Ogham Space Mark U+1680, but >> it's probably ok. Unsure about the Mongolian Vowel Separator, but I'm >> following up by asking Martin Heijdra about that... > > OK, I've reverted this, because unlike the other characters in Z, the > Mongolian Vowel Separator is not a word-separating character, so should > probably stay underlined. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013Feb/0006.html And apparently the UTC is fixing that by removing the Mongolian Vowel Separator from Zs, so, back to Z. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 08:27:45 UTC