- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 00:21:23 -0800
- To: MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, 'WWW International' <www-international@w3.org>
On 02/02/2013 12:54 PM, fantasai wrote:
> On 02/01/2013 10:33 PM, MURAKAMI Shinyu wrote:
>>
>> I think this behavior is much better than to hide ruby in many cases.
>
> OK. So, there are several things we could do with the spec, which of these do
> you recommend?
>
> Question 1:
>
> Should we remove allowing to hide ruby when emphasis marks are present?
> a) yes
> b) no
Third option:
c) Allow hiding emphasis marks when ruby and marks are both present,
instead of hiding ruby when both are present.
~fantasai
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2013 08:21:52 UTC