- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 23:37:17 +0000
- To: www-international@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19253 --- Comment #1 from Erika Doyle Navara <erika.doyle@microsoft.com> --- Instead of "surrounded by", which might imply that the <rp> element actually contains the <rt> elements rather than being a sibling to them, how about the following: An rp element followed by one or more rt elements, followed by another rp element. Here is the staged change for review: https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/6b284107feab5267292377504977b37ca0a4d0f9 It changes this part of the spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html51/text-level-semantics.html#the-ruby-element Also, given that "Contexts in which this element can be used" for <rp> elements states that: As a child of a ruby element, either immediately before or immediately after an rt element. http://www.w3.org/TR/html51/text-level-semantics.html#the-rp-element ...it is unclear whether the following would be allowed: <ruby>BASE<rp>(</rp><rt>annotation1</rt><rt>annotation2</rt><rp>)</rp></ruby> Is the i18n IG / HTML WG okay with this ambiguity, or should we be more strict and drop the "or more" part to only allow one <rt> element per <rp> pair? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You reported the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 2 January 2013 23:37:18 UTC