- From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:06:51 -0700
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- CC: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
You "should" use content in NFC, but if you don't RDF processors won't do any normalization for you. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 11, 2011, at 2:00 PM, "David Wood" <david@3roundstones.com> wrote: > > On Oct 11, 2011, at 16:49, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com> wrote: > >>>> B) >>>> 2) drop the "SHOULD use NFC" requirement on literals >>> >>> I'm good with this one, unless we decide to do something around our ISSUE-63: >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/63 >>> >> >> For reasons I just outlined, I think this would be a mistake. By avoiding denormalized text, RDF users can help ensure interoperability. In practice, this is a no-op for implementers. > > Why do you see it as a noop? > > Regards, > Dave > >> >> Addison
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 21:07:48 UTC