- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:54:04 -0500
- To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Cc: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>, W3C style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>, "'WWW International' (www-international@w3.org)" <www-international@w3.org>
Koji Ishii scripsit: > Even for "." (PERIOD) case Xaxio raised, I'm still skeptical whether > CSS should treat it differently from Unicode or not. I understand how > "a.m." should be titlecased, but I haven't investigated if there were > any counter-cases, nor asked if Unicode guys considered that case > or not. Unicode guys must have reasons to make "." as MidNumLet, > not MidNum. IE must have reasons to make "." not to break words in > titlecasing, and WebKit must have reasons to break. I'm not saying > that Xaxio is wrong, but just that we still know little to make the > decision to do it differently from what Unicode defines. No algorithmic solution can get all the cases correct. As Don Knuth says in the comments to the English-language TeX hyphenation tables, if you want bath-ing to hyphenate correctly you will have to live with noth-ing (which is tolerable, especially for Americans) and anyth-ing (which is not). He ends by saying "You can't have every-thing." The argument for sticking to Unicode rules is that they mostly get it right and (importantly) *they already exist*. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, LOTR:FOTR
Received on Monday, 21 February 2011 17:54:33 UTC