- From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:07:14 +0200
- To: "KangHao Lu (Kenny)" <kennyluck@w3.org>
- Cc: WWW International <www-international@w3.org>, ITS Interest Group <public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org>, "MURATA (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>, Brady Duga <duga@ebooktechnologies.com>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTin+M1Y_fTRPPDPosxfFFvdZufQTQngB4YCH1MZB@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Kenny, many thanks for this information. Some personal comments below. 2010/9/29 KangHao Lu (Kenny) <kennyluck@w3.org> > Hi internationalization folks, > > This is some background info concerning the possible collaboration between > the internationalization activity and IDPF's EPUB e-book format. This is > brought up in the internationalization > > Murata-san, the chair of EGLS (Enhanced Global Language Support subgroup), > has compiled the list of requirements [1], and the goal for the Taipei > meeting next week (Oct. 5, 6) is to identify potential solutions. Since the > participants of EGLS mostly consists of east Asian people, I do worry that > some other internationalization requirements besides CJK-issues are not > covered. > > The following requirements raised by the participants (see the latter part > of [1]) are not covered in the compiled version (the former part of [1]): > > - EGLS_JT_1 Hebrew character support > > I personally think this is a font issue, and it should be almost covered by > EGLS_CG4 - Font Embedding > > - EGLS_JT_2 Bi-directional text > > I personally think this is already covered by EPUB 2.0. > > - EGLS_JT_3 Diacritical mark placement > > This I have no idea. > > - EGLS_PS_R1Use UAX#14 (Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm) > > This seems to be like an anti-requirement of the EGLS_LBR series. FYI, CSS3 > Text Level 3 will probably have the 'line-break' property which will violate > pure UAX#14. > > > As IDPF has a very tight schedule, the deadline for new requirements > already past. I don't know whether it is still possible to bring up new > requirements related to internationalization, but if you have new > requirement, I can bring it to the Taipei meeting next week to see if > exceptions can be made. I personally think IDPF is very > internationalization-friendly. > > EGLS might have a IRC conference meeting attomorrow at 0 am UTC, but I am > not very sure. If you want to participate in the Taipei meeting, you might > want to contact Murata-san. > > > > Other internationalization related EPUB subgroups and topics that are > beyond EGLS: > > - Text Content Subgroup > http://code.google.com/p/epub-revision/wiki/TextContent > > They are talking about better support for converting dictionaries to > EPUB[3]. Can Internationalization Tag Set (ITS) be introduced to the format? > ITS currently provides no information related to dictionary entries. As [3] shows, there are already a lot of formats related to dictonaries. The role of ITS I can see here is to identify what part of a document a dictionary entry is, and what kind of entry it is (TEI, OLIF etc.). In other words: ITS could help the interoperability for applications using dictionary entry. Note, btw., that in its current version ITS does not have such a facility, so one would need an update of ITS. > > - Metadata Subgroup http://code.google.com/p/epub-revision/wiki/Metadata > > I also think Google Translate's 'class="notranslate"' is interesting, but > I am not sure which EPUB subgroup this feature belongs to. (BTW, EPUB is > currently based on XHTML which does have namespace support so maybe ITS is > possible?). > It would be good to have a "translate" flag within epub, IMO. To be compatible with ITS, there is no need to use a namespaced attribute, as long as the definition of the attribute is aligned with the definition of "Translate" in ITS (e.g. "has two values 'yes' or 'no'). See http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#trans-datacat for details. Regarding class='notranslate': I think that approach has the drawback of overloading the "class" attribute. Having a separate "translate" flag is better IMO. Note that i18n core is also going to push within HTML5 for a separate flag - see http://www.w3.org/2010/09/29-i18n-minutes.html#action02. > > > You might also want to discuss the best solution we have for "EGLS_O1 > Phonetics in Metadata" [4]. Can ITS cover this? > I don't think that you need ITS here, the solution proposed by Murata-san looks fine to me. Cheers, Felix > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/epub-revision/wiki/EGLS_requirement_list > [2] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text/#line-break > [3] http://code.google.com/p/epub-revision/wiki/DictionariesGlossaries > [4] > http://code.google.com/p/epub-revision/wiki/EGLS_solutions#Solutions_to_Phonetics_in_Metadata > > > Cheers, > Kenny > > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 20:07:50 UTC