- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:48:09 +0200
- To: CE Whitehead <cewcathar@hotmail.com>
- Cc: www-international@w3.org, ishida@w3.org
CE Whitehead, Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:08:49 -0400:
>>> I looked at your proposal Leif:
>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/lang_versus_contentLanguage
>>> "The value of the content attribute of the last occurring meta
>>> content-language element must be the empty string."
>>> { MY COMMENT: no not really;
>>> I think it should optionally be lang="" and some single language
>>> declaration tag;
>>
>> Yes. Thanks to your mention of the QA article about "no language", I
>> think I will make some drastic changes to it.
>
> This should be changed, yes, so that it can either be lang="und"
> lang="" or lang="fr" (or "en" or "fr" or "zh" or "ar" or "no" etc.)
New change proposal: Allow multiple values in the http-equiv
Content-Language element (ISSUE 88) [1]
Differences from the former:
Accepted Ian’ algorithm.
Accepted single language tag as a valid value.
Dropped request for the empty string to be valid.
Added request to make multiple values valid.
[1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ContentLanguages
--
leif halvard silli
Received on Friday, 23 April 2010 20:48:45 UTC