- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:29:51 +0200
- To: www-international@w3.org
The I18N WG's language declarations tests has been updated. 3 comments in that regard. http://www.w3.org/International/tests/tests-html-css/tests-language-declarations/results-language-declarations#summary (1) "Declarations in the Content-Language meta element were recognized by all browsers tested except Opera." Actually, Opera seems to support it. But in a buggy way. I have seen that it support it for <div> elements, but not for <p> elements. (And it probably has other bugs as well.) One can see this by trying the tests that Ian Hickson recently published. http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/html/meta/content-language/ (2) "For the browsers that support declarations in both html and meta elements (IE8, Firefox, Safari and Chrome), the html element always had precedence over the meta element." Isn't an empty lang="" attribute also a "declaration"? May be you should make clear that you do not speak about empty lang in the above. (See below about the buggy handling of empty lang="".) (3) Suggestion for the next update: This test update incorporated some HTML5 and XHTML5 tests. But how about adding a test section for the only new thing with regard to language declaration functionality in HTML5 - namely the empty lang=""? HTML5 aligns the semantics of empty lang="" with the semantics of empty xml:lang="". But the support for this is sloppy both XML/XHTML and in HTML. But browsers are buggy when it comes to the semantics of the empty lang=""/xml:lang="". Both when it comes to HTML5 and also when it comes to XHTML/XML. Thus this should be a really good thing to add tests for. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 03:30:25 UTC