"Martin J. Dürst" scripsit: > I agree with your comments re. presentation order. But the word 'visual' > is more than historical, and is justified by more than a simple > 'parochial' LTR assumption. Visual contains explicit linebreaks, and > does not use subruns that go the other way (for 'logical', such subruns > are used at least for numbers, if not for embeddings). Fair enough. -- Unless it was by accident that I had John Cowan offended someone, I never apologized. cowan@ccil.org --Quentin Crisp http://www.ccil.org/~cowanReceived on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 04:14:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:40:57 UTC