- From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:13:38 -0400
- To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Cc: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>, Matitiahu Allouche <matial@il.ibm.com>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, www-international@w3.org
"Martin J. Dürst" scripsit:
> I agree with your comments re. presentation order. But the word 'visual'
> is more than historical, and is justified by more than a simple
> 'parochial' LTR assumption. Visual contains explicit linebreaks, and
> does not use subruns that go the other way (for 'logical', such subruns
> are used at least for numbers, if not for embeddings).
Fair enough.
--
Unless it was by accident that I had John Cowan
offended someone, I never apologized. cowan@ccil.org
--Quentin Crisp http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 04:14:20 UTC