- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:22:46 +0200
- To: www-international@w3.org
Dear I18N group, ERT WG is hopefully putting together a Last Call for EARL 1.0 and were going through the Requirements [1] again. We have this requirement: * D07 - EARL 1.0 will provide vocabularies that support the internationalization infrastructure included in [RDF]. We also have a more generic requirement to support the QA framework: * D02 - The specifications and technical notes that comprise EARL 1.0 will be developed and published according to the [W3C QA Framework]. Question: is there anything more we need to do to ensure that we are requiring ourselves to support I18N to the highest extent possible? Basically we see no issues with any of the vocabularies that we are defining by EARL, so we should get everything for free through RDF. However, we do want to have a requirement that forces us to do the adequate level of due-diligence checking. [1] <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Requirements-20090526> Thanks, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 11:23:22 UTC