- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 08:29:36 +0100
- To: Jonathan Rosenne <rosennej@qsm.co.il>
- CC: www-international@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
David Woolley wrote: > Jonathan Rosenne wrote: >> In some areas of the world, Hindi digits are used. In other areas, Arabic >> digits are used. When someone looks at a web page in Arabic, he could be > > There are no specifically Hindi digits. Each Indic script (e.g. > including Thai) tends to have its own digits. Hindi is written in > Devanagari script, but Marathi is also written in that script. > > Also, in English, "Arabic numerals" is commonly used to refer to > distinction between a place value system with a zero and the old Roman > numeral system, not to to the actual Arabic glyphs. > >> expected to see the digits he is used to. >> >> The viewer's preference may be independent of the preference of the >> originator of the web page. > > That requires semantic mark up for numbers. In particular, for Chinese, > serial numbers, and even things like bus route numbers, are represented > as a string of digits, whereas numerical numbers have multipliers > embedded. In English, this happens when speaking numbers, but not when > writing them. (Note that, in real life, European style numbers are used > in China.) > > It would make sense for telephone numbers to be presented right to left > in Arabic, even though numeric numbers have their most significant digit > on the right. I don't know the actual situation. That should have been "most significant digit on the left", i.e. last, rather than first (as in European and Chinese). -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 07:30:14 UTC