- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:53:30 -0000
- To: "'Swan, Henny'" <Henny.Swan@rnib.org.uk>
- Cc: <cfynn@gmx.net>, <www-international@w3.org>
Tibetan examples here: http://rishida.net/blog/?p=101 RI ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/International/ http://rishida.net/blog/ http://rishida.net/ > -----Original Message----- > From: www-international-request@w3.org [mailto:www-international- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Fynn > Sent: 31 January 2008 08:48 > To: www-international@w3.org > Cc: Swan, Henny > Subject: Re: Chinese language and emphasis > > > > > Swan, Henny wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > I'm wondering if anyone could answer a couple of questions for me. As I > > understand it Japanese doesn’t use italics as a form of emphasis, so > > using |<i>| tags around ideographic text is a big no no. Can anyone > > clarify if other languages, specifically Chinese, fall into this > > category? > > Tibetan uses dot-like characters U+0F37 or U +0F35 rather than italics for > emphasis. One of these should be placed under each syllable of emphasised > text. > > > - Chris
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2008 11:50:18 UTC