- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 16:52:20 +0100
- To: Simon Montagu <smontagu@smontagu.org>
- CC: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>, www-international@w3.org
OLD SUBJECT: Re: BiDi IRI deployment? Simon Montagu wrote: > > Frank Ellermann wrote: >> [Digression... I'm not completely convinced that numbers are >> really written LTR in RTL languages, or if they just have a >> "little endian" concept where RTL languages use "big endian"] > > This question comes up every so often. I can assure you that native > speakers of RTL languages write numbers LTR, whether by pen or by keyboard. > This is not what my (north african arabic) native speaker informant tells me. He tells me: - classical arabic numbers are RTL (compare Olde English "four and twenty blackbirds" - when writing in classical arabic mode numbers are written RTL (i.e. the hand moves from right to left) - dialects are polluted by the colonial languages (e.g. north african arabic by french). - this pollution results in numbers being said and/or written LTR (i.e. the hand jumps leftwards, moves back to the right when writing the number, and then jumps leftward again). PO: It seems to me that arabic numbers were always RTL with least significant digit first; when imported into western Europe these gradually became LTR with most significant digit first (because of the LTR writing system). This resulted in changes such that the phrase "four and twenty" is now archaic, because of the least significant digit first construction. With European colonialism the most significant digit first meme was re-exported from western Europe back into arabic speaking communities, resulting in the apparent LTR numbers within a RTL writing system. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2008 15:53:24 UTC