- From: Stephen Deach <sdeach@adobe.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 07:58:45 -0700
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>, Stephen Deach <sdeach@adobe.com>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: www-international@w3.org, ltru@ietf.org
I just wanted to make sure this "shortest code" issue was considered
carefully.
A lot of people I've talked to about internationalization issues over
the years simply had "assumed" that the 3-letter ISO codes superceded the
2-letter ones, or chose to use all 3-letter codes rather than a mix of 2 &
3 because it was easier to make it a fixed-length field.
I understand your goal is to eventually make this simpler, by eliminating
multiple formats for each subtoken and moving to a single registry/list. As
a general process I always try to accept ill-formed input, but emit
corrected output (since you pretty much have to grandfather all past formats).
At 2006.09.23-11:29(+0900), Martin Duerst wrote:
>Exactly. Codes should be converted at the boundaries to systems that
>can't handle anything else that three-letter codes. It has to be done
>one way, so it can as well be done both ways.
>
>Regards, Martin.
>
>At 00:07 06/09/23, Misha Wolf wrote:
> >
> >That would be seriously broken. It would encourage
> >people to violate BCP 47.
> >
> >Misha
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Stephen Deach [mailto:sdeach@adobe.com]
> >Sent: 22 September 2006 16:05
> >To: Misha Wolf; Richard Ishida
> >Cc: www-international@w3.org
> >Subject: RE: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes
> >
> >I would strongly recomment taht all processing applications support both
> >2
> >& 3 letter ISO codes. It was the only way to get some countries and some
> >
> >applications (especially in business databases) simply always use the 3
> >letter coded.
> >
> >
> >This email was sent to you by Reuters, the global news and information
> company.
> >To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com
> >
> >Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
> >except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
> Reuters Ltd.
>
>
>#-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
>#-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
---Steve Deach
sdeach@adobe.com
Received on Saturday, 23 September 2006 14:59:40 UTC