- From: Stephen Deach <sdeach@adobe.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 07:58:45 -0700
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>, Stephen Deach <sdeach@adobe.com>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: www-international@w3.org, ltru@ietf.org
I just wanted to make sure this "shortest code" issue was considered carefully. A lot of people I've talked to about internationalization issues over the years simply had "assumed" that the 3-letter ISO codes superceded the 2-letter ones, or chose to use all 3-letter codes rather than a mix of 2 & 3 because it was easier to make it a fixed-length field. I understand your goal is to eventually make this simpler, by eliminating multiple formats for each subtoken and moving to a single registry/list. As a general process I always try to accept ill-formed input, but emit corrected output (since you pretty much have to grandfather all past formats). At 2006.09.23-11:29(+0900), Martin Duerst wrote: >Exactly. Codes should be converted at the boundaries to systems that >can't handle anything else that three-letter codes. It has to be done >one way, so it can as well be done both ways. > >Regards, Martin. > >At 00:07 06/09/23, Misha Wolf wrote: > > > >That would be seriously broken. It would encourage > >people to violate BCP 47. > > > >Misha > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Stephen Deach [mailto:sdeach@adobe.com] > >Sent: 22 September 2006 16:05 > >To: Misha Wolf; Richard Ishida > >Cc: www-international@w3.org > >Subject: RE: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes > > > >I would strongly recomment taht all processing applications support both > >2 > >& 3 letter ISO codes. It was the only way to get some countries and some > > > >applications (especially in business databases) simply always use the 3 > >letter coded. > > > > > >This email was sent to you by Reuters, the global news and information > company. > >To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com > > > >Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, > >except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of > Reuters Ltd. > > >#-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University >#-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp ---Steve Deach sdeach@adobe.com
Received on Saturday, 23 September 2006 14:59:40 UTC