- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:54:28 +0900
- To: "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>, "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>, public-iri@w3.org
The IRI spec doesn't say anything about ZWJ/ZWNJ, and so it can be said to be "at least not wrong". IRIs, except for transcoding issues from legacy encodings and those parts that are case-insensitive, are always compared codepoint by codepoint. I guess Unicode should fix their text about ZWJ/ZWNJ, but there is nothing in the IRI spec (as far as I see) that needs fixing for this issue. Regards, Martin. At 17:32 05/08/16, Felix Sasaki wrote: >Hi, > >This came up at the unicode list. I'm not sure if is an issue for IRI / >the future development of the IRI spec, but I'm bringing it to the >attention of www-international and public-iri. Any comments?
Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2005 10:29:15 UTC